2015
DOI: 10.3813/aaa.918896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speech Intelligibility Evaluation for Mobile Phones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This algorithm predicts intelligibility from clean and degraded speech by averaging the sample correlation coefficient of short segments of clean and degraded envelopes across 15 one-third octave bands. The STOI measure has been shown to correlate well with measured intelligibility in conditions including different additive noise sources [13], noise reduction processing [42], [13], hearing-aid and cochlear implant processing [25], and noisy speech transmitted via telephone [43]. Later work has shown the STOI measure to be closely related to an estimate of information transmission [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This algorithm predicts intelligibility from clean and degraded speech by averaging the sample correlation coefficient of short segments of clean and degraded envelopes across 15 one-third octave bands. The STOI measure has been shown to correlate well with measured intelligibility in conditions including different additive noise sources [13], noise reduction processing [42], [13], hearing-aid and cochlear implant processing [25], and noisy speech transmitted via telephone [43]. Later work has shown the STOI measure to be closely related to an estimate of information transmission [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This observation is confirmed for hearing impaired listeners in [28], which shows that the CSII and the STOI measure perform favorably to other measures at predicting the effect of noise reduction algorithms. The STOI measure has later been shown to compare well with other measures with respect to predicting the impact of a number of detrimental effects and processing schemes relevant to users of hearing aids and cochlear implants [8] and for predicting the intelligibility of noisy speech transmitted by telephone [4]. Finally, we mention the Speech Intelligibility prediction based on Mutual Information (SIMI) measure [12], which is very similar to the STOI measure in structure and performance, but which is based on information theoretical considerations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no relationship with sound pressure level and usage scenario was shown for mobile phones. For three mobile phones evaluated by Jørgensen et al (2015), transmission of speech through the mobile phones under study led to degraded speech intelligibility in comparison to the reference condition without transmission through mobile phones (Jørgensen et al, 2015). The goals of this study are: first, to determine whether behavioral aspects can have an influence on the SAR induced by a smartphone; second, to quantify speech intelligibility and in-ear sound pressure level during those same exposure scenarios; and finally, come to a conclusion about which of the three studied scenarios results in the lowest co-exposure to RF-EMF and in-ear sound pressure and whether changing from one usage scenario to another can serve as a non-technological way of reducing exposure to one or both of the studied physical agents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%