1984
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2420140203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speech norms and perceptions of ethno‐linguistic group differences: Toward a conceptual and research framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

1984
1984
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fluency in the indigenous language or lingua franca of a community has long been recognized as an important social factor. Poor fluency can provide a means by which community group members distance themselves from those whom they perceive to belong to an “outgroup” ( Giles & Johnson, 1986, McKirnan & Hamayan, 1984). Although nonverbal methods of communicating may override the importance of local language fluency under certain circumstances ( Vrij & Winkel, 1994), still the ability to communicate in the prevailing language of one's community stands out as a critical element in intergroup relations ( Giles, 1977).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fluency in the indigenous language or lingua franca of a community has long been recognized as an important social factor. Poor fluency can provide a means by which community group members distance themselves from those whom they perceive to belong to an “outgroup” ( Giles & Johnson, 1986, McKirnan & Hamayan, 1984). Although nonverbal methods of communicating may override the importance of local language fluency under certain circumstances ( Vrij & Winkel, 1994), still the ability to communicate in the prevailing language of one's community stands out as a critical element in intergroup relations ( Giles, 1977).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Les normes plus nouvelles valorisent plutot le travail a l'exterieur comme le seul moyen de se realiser pleinement (Hillion & Laroche, 1981;Mason, Czajka & Arber, 1976). D'apres McKirnan et Hamayan (1983), les normes servent a identifier les membres des non-membres. Le manque de consensus vis-a-vis les normes relatives au role feminin risque de bouleverser le processus d'identite sexuelle des femmes.…”
unclassified