2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.09.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speech prognosis and need of pharyngeal flap for non syndromic vs syndromic Pierre Robin Sequence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
16
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study agrees with Khosla et al and we found no difference between the PRS patients and the CPO patients who developed VPI requiring surgical correction, however their data only compared speech outcomes in patients with soft palate clefts only, repaired with a Z-plasty technique [14]. A study by de Buys et al comparing speech outcomes between syndromic and non-syndromic PRS patients showed no differences in the need for surgical intervention for VPI [15]. Furthermore, the rate of surgical correction of VPI in the syndromic PRS patients was 23% compared to 36% of the non-syndromic patients, with an average rate of 31% for all patients, which is higher than what we found but less than that found by Witt et al [6,15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our study agrees with Khosla et al and we found no difference between the PRS patients and the CPO patients who developed VPI requiring surgical correction, however their data only compared speech outcomes in patients with soft palate clefts only, repaired with a Z-plasty technique [14]. A study by de Buys et al comparing speech outcomes between syndromic and non-syndromic PRS patients showed no differences in the need for surgical intervention for VPI [15]. Furthermore, the rate of surgical correction of VPI in the syndromic PRS patients was 23% compared to 36% of the non-syndromic patients, with an average rate of 31% for all patients, which is higher than what we found but less than that found by Witt et al [6,15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In our PRS patients we did not identify higher rates of VPI after palate repair compared to cleft palate only patients, which contradicts the findings of Witt et al [15]. Post-palatoplasty VPI occurs in up to one fifth of non-syndromic children who have had their cleft palate repaired [8].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PRS includes a micrognatia or underdevelopment of the mandible which causes glossoptosis, a relatively enlarged tongue relative to the space within the oral cavity. The glossoptosis interferes with the fusion of the palatal shelves during the early embryonic period (4 -12 weeks) resulting in a sub -total cleft of the secondary palate [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Cleft Palate and Submucous Cleft Palatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in several cases, an early mandibular distraction is indicated. All patients with syndromic PRS are present with VPI [21][22][23]27]. …”
Section: Syndromic Pierre -Robin Sequencementioning
confidence: 99%