2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-31223-6_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speedith: A Diagrammatic Reasoner for Spider Diagrams

Abstract: In this paper, we introduce Speedith which is a diagrammatic theorem prover for the language of spider diagrams. Spider diagrams are a well-known logic for which there is a sound and complete set of inference rules. Speedith provides a way to input diagrams, transform them via the diagrammatic inference rules, and prove diagrammatic theorems. It is designed as a program that plugs into existing general purpose theorem provers. This allows for seamless formal verification of diagrammatic proof steps within esta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The description of the internal structure of the RDH, and more in particular of the various types of complementarities, crucially relies on the idea that smaller diagrams occur inside bigger diagrams. These notions of subdiagram or diagram embedding/nesting have been studied for other types of diagrams as well, more in particular Euler diagrams [7], Venn diagrams [8], spider diagrams [9] or algebra diagrams [10]. The analysis proposed in the present paper is very much in line with the visual grammar or visual syntax approach developed by Engelhardt [11, p. 104] in that "various syntactic principles can be identified in graphics of different types, and the nature of visual representation allows for visual nesting and recursion [...] any object may contain a set of (sub-)objects within the space that it occupies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The description of the internal structure of the RDH, and more in particular of the various types of complementarities, crucially relies on the idea that smaller diagrams occur inside bigger diagrams. These notions of subdiagram or diagram embedding/nesting have been studied for other types of diagrams as well, more in particular Euler diagrams [7], Venn diagrams [8], spider diagrams [9] or algebra diagrams [10]. The analysis proposed in the present paper is very much in line with the visual grammar or visual syntax approach developed by Engelhardt [11, p. 104] in that "various syntactic principles can be identified in graphics of different types, and the nature of visual representation allows for visual nesting and recursion [...] any object may contain a set of (sub-)objects within the space that it occupies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various formalisations of specific reasoning systems using a single kind of representation have been implemented, including first order [16,15], higher order [11,21], diagrammatic [27,13,28], among many others. A few heterogeneous reasoning systems that integrate multiple representations have also been built [2,26], as well as some tools for re-representing problems and knowledge across and within systems [19,12,23].…”
Section: The Role Of Representation In Reasoningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We enumerate the following compound inference rules (others can be found in Howse et al [12] and Urbas et al [33]):…”
Section: Compound Inference Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Speedith is our stand-alone interactive diagrammatic theorem prover for the logic of spider diagrams [33]. Moreover, it was also designed to be easily pluggable into other proof-assisting software.…”
Section: Architecture and Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation