2009
DOI: 10.3354/meps07774
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sperm characteristics and competitive ability in farmed and wild cod

Abstract: The development of cod aquaculture has raised concerns about its effect on wild stocks. One risk is hybridisation between escapees and wild cod, causing genetic introgression, and, potentially, fitness depressions in wild populations. The potential for hybridisation depends on escapee success in mating competition with wild fish. Cod have a complex mating system, with males likely to adopt either dominant or sub-dominant roles, the latter typically achieving reproductive success through sperm competition. Stud… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It might be argued that the position of farmed males over the spawning arena and the midwater spawning location reflects an alternative spawning strategy, with 'satellite' males rushing in to release milt after a mated pair has spawned (Hutchings et al 1999). In our laboratory experiment, we were unable to identify such males, and the results of a concurrent study suggest that such a strategy is unsuccessful for farmed males because they performed poorly in sperm competition against wild cod (Skjaeraasen et al 2009). …”
Section: Vertical Dynamics and Reproductive Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…It might be argued that the position of farmed males over the spawning arena and the midwater spawning location reflects an alternative spawning strategy, with 'satellite' males rushing in to release milt after a mated pair has spawned (Hutchings et al 1999). In our laboratory experiment, we were unable to identify such males, and the results of a concurrent study suggest that such a strategy is unsuccessful for farmed males because they performed poorly in sperm competition against wild cod (Skjaeraasen et al 2009). …”
Section: Vertical Dynamics and Reproductive Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…comm.). Furthermore, the survival estimates are likely to be overestimates as sperm quality, and subsequent fertilisation success, is reduced for farmed males compared to wild males (Skjaeraasen et al 2009, Butts et al 2011.…”
Section: Survival Of Eggs From Farmed Atlantic Codmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such traits include sperm swimming velocity, sperm viability (the proportion of live sperm in a male's ejaculate) and sperm length-all of which have been shown to predict competitive fertilization success or fertility in several taxa. For example, differences in sperm swimming velocity between competing ejaculates is the primary determinant of competitive fertilization success in some birds (Birkhead et al, 1999;Denk et al, 2005) and fishes (Gage et al, 2004;Liljedal et al, 2008;Skjaeraasen et al, 2009), and is associated with fertility (non-competitive fertilization rates) in mammals (Gomendio and Roldan, 2008). Similarly, sperm viability predicts competitive fertilization success in insects (García-González and Simmons, 2005) and is associated with the strength of selection from sperm competition across insect taxa (Hunter and Birkhead, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%