1970
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1970.tb01176.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sperm Competition and Its Evolutionary Consequences in the Insects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

29
2,204
4
23

Year Published

1980
1980
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3,230 publications
(2,260 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
29
2,204
4
23
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, amongst maleterminated copulations, copulation times significantly increased with the numbers of other males that the female had mated with. These patterns are consistent with predicted behaviours based on models of sperm competition (Parker, 1970;Parker et al, 1997), and with behaviours recorded in both S. lycidas (Wada et al, 2010) and an unidentified pygmy octopus (Cigliano, 1995) where males of these species were reported to adjust copulation times, presumably spent performing sperm removal and transferring multiple spermatophores, with females based on whether they were the last male to mate with her.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, amongst maleterminated copulations, copulation times significantly increased with the numbers of other males that the female had mated with. These patterns are consistent with predicted behaviours based on models of sperm competition (Parker, 1970;Parker et al, 1997), and with behaviours recorded in both S. lycidas (Wada et al, 2010) and an unidentified pygmy octopus (Cigliano, 1995) where males of these species were reported to adjust copulation times, presumably spent performing sperm removal and transferring multiple spermatophores, with females based on whether they were the last male to mate with her.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Relevant models of sperm competition, where sperm supply is limited, imply that male cephalopods could potentially achieve optimal fertilisation success by investing less time copulating with females that they have already mated with (Parker, 1970), with females that are holding less sperm from competing males and therefore pose less risk of sperm competition (Ball & Parker, 2007), and/or when additional factors such as male mating order might give males an inherent advantage towards successful fertilisation (Parker, 1990). Likewise, male cephalopods should be expected to invest more time and/or spermatophores with novel females and females posing a high-risk of sperm competition (Parker, 1970;1990;Parker et al, 1997;Ball & Parker, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data on ejaculate competition between males are unavailable for H. apicalis. However, the above assumption is supported by a large amount of comparative data from insect studies showing that the last male to mate with a female fertilizes most of the eggs she lays between matings (see Parker, 1970). This interpretation of the selective history of nuptial feeding explains not only why males employ nuptial feeding, but also why they use large prey as nuptial offerings.…”
Section: Apicalis)mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…(1982) concluiram que o mesmo seja originário da coagulação do esperma do macho, desempenhando uma direta influência sobre o sucesso reprodutivo da espécie. Plugs copulatórios já foram registrados numa variedade de taxa, incluindo insetos (PARKER, 1970), ofídios (DEVINE, 1975), marsupiais (HARTMANN, 1924), insectívoros (EADIE, 1948), primatas (TINKLEPAUGH, 1930) e roedores (HARTUNG & DEWSBURY, 1978;BAUMGARDNER el 01.,1982;PEREIRA, 1982;DEWSBURY, 1988 dentre outros autores). Durante a Fase I, sempre que constatado, as fêmeas com plug foram consideradas grávidas, em início de gestação.…”
Section: Methodsunclassified