2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2009.08.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sperm morphology of beef bulls evaluated by two different methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
1
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
32
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This disqualification index is justified by the fact that the evaluated animals were in the phase of transition to sexual maturity characterized by the physical aspects (rectilinear sperm motility, vigor, and turbulence) and morphological properties of the semen as found in the present experiment (Table 1). The values obtained, presented low standard deviation and are similar to those described by Brito et al (2004), Freneau et al (2006), and Freneau et al (2010), who also used young Nelore bulls in their experiments.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…This disqualification index is justified by the fact that the evaluated animals were in the phase of transition to sexual maturity characterized by the physical aspects (rectilinear sperm motility, vigor, and turbulence) and morphological properties of the semen as found in the present experiment (Table 1). The values obtained, presented low standard deviation and are similar to those described by Brito et al (2004), Freneau et al (2006), and Freneau et al (2010), who also used young Nelore bulls in their experiments.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Eosin-nigrosin staining is also recommended by WHO as a basic method for evaluating human sperm morphology (Björndahl et al 2003(Björndahl et al , 2004. Apart from sperm morphology assessments, this method also enables the identification of living and dead sperm (Sprecher & Coe 1996, Zambelli & Cunto 2006, Freneau et al 2010. Nevertheless, both staining methods allow only for observation of the spermatozoon as a uniform structure and enable measurements of only the sperm head and tail.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These abnormalities vary from morphological defects that are evident on clinical examination to those which are more subtly defective (Chenoweth et al 2005). An understanding of the significance of specific types of sperm abnormalities and the numbers in which these are detected in the ejaculate allows the diagnostician to make a prognosis of fertility and might indicate a course of treatment to assist in the recovery of a male with abnormal sperm production (Freneau et al 2010). It should be noted that there is currently a substantial amount of support for the recommendation that the minimum percentage of morphologically normal sperm in an ejaculate should lie in the range of 70-80% in order to achieve optimum fertility (Kuster et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%