1979
DOI: 10.1007/bf01770028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spermatogenesis in agricultural workers exposed to dibromochloropropane (DBCP)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Male workers with DBCP-induced oligospermia or azoospermia had increased levels of FSH, and normal levels of testosterone (15,16). In animals, testicular damage by DBCP is accompanied by hematopoietic toxicity such as anemia, leukopenia, or bone marrow hypoplasia (1 1, 17).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Male workers with DBCP-induced oligospermia or azoospermia had increased levels of FSH, and normal levels of testosterone (15,16). In animals, testicular damage by DBCP is accompanied by hematopoietic toxicity such as anemia, leukopenia, or bone marrow hypoplasia (1 1, 17).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major effects were azoospermia or oligospermia. Sandifer et al (1979) showed significant differences in median sperm counts among formulators, custom applicators, and farmers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Even for chemicals well known to target human reproductive system, such as 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane, a health-based guidance value related to observed effects in humans is difficult to derive. Most available data came from occupational settings, in case of 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane, from cohorts of workers exposed to this nematocide during production at factories (Potashnik et al, 1978;Whorton et al, 1979), and from cohorts of applicators and farmers (Glass et al, 1979;Sandifer et al, 1979) and actual levels of exposure were not established. Animal studies intended to investigate reproductive effects should follow certain protocols that were outlined elsewhere (EPA, 1991(EPA, , 1996(EPA, , 1998FDA, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%