2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-018-0456-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SPH-FEM coupled simulation of SSI for conducting seismic analysis on a rectangular underground structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kalateh and Koosheh [30] used the SPH-FEM method to simulate the interaction between a convergent-divergent nozzle and cavitating flow, and the results showed that the behaviour of liquid and vapor at the interface matched other numerical and experimental methods. Liang and Chen [31] applied the SPH-FEM method to soil-structure interaction problems during the seismic analysis of a rectangular underground structure, and results indicated that the distribution and magnitude of seismic earth pressure were influenced by the magnitude of soil deformation. Fragassa et al [32] analyzed the effect of air in FSI problems by coupling FEM and SPH.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kalateh and Koosheh [30] used the SPH-FEM method to simulate the interaction between a convergent-divergent nozzle and cavitating flow, and the results showed that the behaviour of liquid and vapor at the interface matched other numerical and experimental methods. Liang and Chen [31] applied the SPH-FEM method to soil-structure interaction problems during the seismic analysis of a rectangular underground structure, and results indicated that the distribution and magnitude of seismic earth pressure were influenced by the magnitude of soil deformation. Fragassa et al [32] analyzed the effect of air in FSI problems by coupling FEM and SPH.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phase of high-frequency component at A1 and A15 have a difference of about 180° with that at A17 and A18. The difference in the phase and amplitude of high-frequency component at each structural story is mainly caused by the rotation vibration of the underground structure during earthquake (Liang and Chen, 2019). Figure 12 shows the change in the acceleration of each story from t = 0.6625 s to t = 0.6825 s (Δt = 0.02, which is half of the period of the high-frequency component) in case 2 to illustrate the rotation of underground structure.…”
Section: Seismic Responses Of Soilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Eqs. (14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21), by the ratio of the shear modulus of the medium to that of the lining (μ̃ = μ med /μ lin ), the interaction of the tunnel and the surrounding ground is taken into consideration, as a highly significant phenomenon associated with tunnels [27,28]. For solving the problem based on the derived theoretical solution, a program is developed by using the software Matlab ® .…”
Section: Analytical Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%