2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12652-019-01333-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spherical fuzzy Dombi aggregation operators and their application in group decision making problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
93
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reformat and Yager applied the P yF S in handling the collaborative-based recommender system [24]. In [25], Peng defines several distance, similarity, entropy and inclusion measures for P yF S and their relations between them.Ashraf [26][27][28] defines the spherical fuzzy sets SF Ss, which is the successful extension of picture fuzzy sets and P yF S, by putting a new condition on positive membership ξ, neutral membership η and negative membership functions ν, i.e., 0 ≤ ξ 2 + η 2 + ν 2 ≤ 1. This new condition expand the domain of membership functions like if we have ξ = 0.7, η = 0.5 and ν = 0.5, then we cannot deal it with picture fuzzy set because 0.7 + 0.5 + 0.5 ≥ 1 but 0.7 2 + 0.5 2 + 0.5 2 = 0.49 + 0.25 + 0.25 = 0.99 ≤ 1 and hence SF S applied successfully.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reformat and Yager applied the P yF S in handling the collaborative-based recommender system [24]. In [25], Peng defines several distance, similarity, entropy and inclusion measures for P yF S and their relations between them.Ashraf [26][27][28] defines the spherical fuzzy sets SF Ss, which is the successful extension of picture fuzzy sets and P yF S, by putting a new condition on positive membership ξ, neutral membership η and negative membership functions ν, i.e., 0 ≤ ξ 2 + η 2 + ν 2 ≤ 1. This new condition expand the domain of membership functions like if we have ξ = 0.7, η = 0.5 and ν = 0.5, then we cannot deal it with picture fuzzy set because 0.7 + 0.5 + 0.5 ≥ 1 but 0.7 2 + 0.5 2 + 0.5 2 = 0.49 + 0.25 + 0.25 = 0.99 ≤ 1 and hence SF S applied successfully.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, the example of best company selection was given to prove the proposed technique and to establish its practicability and effectiveness. Our future work is to explore the application of 2TSFLNs in many other researches [46,48,49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Huanhuan et al [47] defined linguistic spherical fuzzy set, combining the idea of linguistic fuzzy set and spherical fuzzy set. Shahzaib et al [48] defined some spherical fuzzy aggregation operators, using Dombi operation, discussed their application on decision making, and also discussed the representation of spherical fuzzy t-norm and t-conorm in [49].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the accumulation operator to combine all the individual SFPRs R t = (r (t) pq ) 5×5 (t = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) into the collective R = (r pq ) 5×5 . Here, we use spherical fuzzy weighted averagingSFWA operator [41] to combine the individual SFPR. Thus, we have We find the collective SFPR: In the directed model relating to a collective SFPR above, as shown in Figure 19, we select those spherical fuzzy numbers whose truthness degrees α pq ≥ 0.5 (p, q = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5), and resulting partial model is shown in Figure 20.…”
Section: Definition 22 a Spherical Fuzzy Preference Relation R On A mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the best choice is a 3 . Now, using a spherical fuzzy weighted geometric (SFWG) operator [41],…”
Section: Of 32mentioning
confidence: 99%