1952
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.88.682.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spherical Model of a Ferromagnet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
71
0
2

Year Published

1953
1953
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
71
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather, the dynamical evolution follows path IV leading to low temperature states E which are quite distinct from D. In other words, the system with N = ∞ supports two different low temperature phases, whose realization depends on the order of the limits t → ∞ and N → ∞. The distinction between these two phases is reminiscent of the difference between the zero field low temperature states in the spherical model [12] and in the mean spherical model [13]. In particular, states E are very similar to the low temperature states in the ideal Bose gas, as it will be clarified in the next section.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Rather, the dynamical evolution follows path IV leading to low temperature states E which are quite distinct from D. In other words, the system with N = ∞ supports two different low temperature phases, whose realization depends on the order of the limits t → ∞ and N → ∞. The distinction between these two phases is reminiscent of the difference between the zero field low temperature states in the spherical model [12] and in the mean spherical model [13]. In particular, states E are very similar to the low temperature states in the ideal Bose gas, as it will be clarified in the next section.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Since the seminal work by Berlin and Kac, 1 it has been widely accepted that classical spherical models [2][3][4] have played an important role in statistical mechanics due to the opportunity they offer to rigorously study properties otherwise uncommonly probed through exact calculations, such as the critical behavior of observables close to thermal phase transitions and finite-size scaling hypotheses, just to name a few. The result by Stanley 5 that the spherical condition maps onto the limit of infinity spin dimensionality of the Heisenberg classical model has provided a way of contact between the spherical model and realistic spin systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Practically it is easier to implement the constraints (4), (5) only in the mean through Lagrange multipliers λ and µ. In the thermodynamic limit N → ∞ it is known that this leads to the same result [18]. The mean spherical Hamiltonian can then be written as…”
Section: The Model: Grand Canonical Partition Function For a System Wmentioning
confidence: 99%