2012
DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/29/23/235012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spherically symmetric Einstein–Maxwell theory and loop quantum gravity corrections

Abstract: Effects of inverse triad corrections and (point) holonomy corrections, occuring in loop quantum gravity, are considered on the properties of Reissner-Nordström black holes. The version of inverse triad corrections with unmodified constraint algebra reveals the possibility of occurrence of three horizons (over a finite range of mass) and also shows a mass threshold beyond which the inner horizon disappears. For the version with modified constraint algebra, coordinate transformations are no longer a good symmetr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…otherwise there is an anomaly and the Hamiltonian constraint is no more first class, which means that it does not generate any symmetries. This conclusion is consistent with what has already been found in the literature [62,66,68,87]. Before going further and discuss this condition, notice that in general relativity the Hamiltonian constraint is of the form (3.34) with (3.41) where the functions A and B are explicitly given by 45) which obviously satisfy the closeness condition (3.44).…”
Section: Closeness Of the Deformed Algebrasupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…otherwise there is an anomaly and the Hamiltonian constraint is no more first class, which means that it does not generate any symmetries. This conclusion is consistent with what has already been found in the literature [62,66,68,87]. Before going further and discuss this condition, notice that in general relativity the Hamiltonian constraint is of the form (3.34) with (3.41) where the functions A and B are explicitly given by 45) which obviously satisfy the closeness condition (3.44).…”
Section: Closeness Of the Deformed Algebrasupporting
confidence: 89%
“…where f 1 and f 2 are functions of π ϕ only. If one imposes the closeness of the constraints algebra, then A and B satisfy the condition (3.52) which translates into 2f 2 = df 1 /dπ ϕ , and one recovers obviously the well-known anomaly-free condition [62,72,87]. To be general, we assume for the moment that f 1 and f 2 are independent.…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See [18] for more details. Finally, our regularization is restricted to the µ 0scheme, as in [18], since introducing holonomy corrections within theμ-scheme, i.e K φ → f (K φ , E x ), and requiring at the same time the anomaly freedom of the effective Dirac's algebra generates inconsistencies as shown in [10]. Therefore, the standard improved dynamics used in polymer cosmological models cannot be generalized as it stands to such inhomogeneous spherically symmetric polymer models.…”
Section: Covariant Polymer Phase Space Regularizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a main difference is that an outer horizon (at t = r s ) is always present in our geometry, while naked singularities appear for superextreme RN black holes. In the end, this naive extension is not satisfactory since it does not allow recovering Schwarzschild's solution in the classical region (r ≫ r s ), except if the parameter ρ becomes r-dependent and tends to zero, which would drastically modify the equations of motion [10].…”
Section: Inverse Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation