1992
DOI: 10.1177/056943459203600103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spillover Asymmetries and a Comparative Technological Advantage

Abstract: This paper offers a framework for examining technology spillovers extant between research teams. A policy-relevant finding is that firms' research organizations must strive to absorb foreign technology. The result of a technology spillover imbalance or asymmetry is that from a country or policy perspective, even for countries sustaining a superior number of world-class research teams, a comparative technological advantage may be lost if the domestic R/D teams fail to absorb and exploit technology as aggressive… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Questions like that are particularly relevant for regional planners who are interested in attracting or building up a certain industry cluster in their region by providing appropriate infrastructure and incentives for the emergence of spillovers and by attracting initial investments. A few authors have provided policy recommendations on these issues based on empirical studies (Chuang and Lin, 1999;Porter, 1998) or static models (Carlisle, 1992). However, they did not explicitly take into account the interaction of distinct clusters in the market and the dynamics of industry evolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Questions like that are particularly relevant for regional planners who are interested in attracting or building up a certain industry cluster in their region by providing appropriate infrastructure and incentives for the emergence of spillovers and by attracting initial investments. A few authors have provided policy recommendations on these issues based on empirical studies (Chuang and Lin, 1999;Porter, 1998) or static models (Carlisle, 1992). However, they did not explicitly take into account the interaction of distinct clusters in the market and the dynamics of industry evolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%