2001
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.63.224412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spin accumulation and resistance due to a domain wall

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
67
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This was based on models of the CPP mode of GMR, where spins will accumulate over that distance as they enter an oppositely polarised ferromagnetic layer [76], leading to bulk spin dependent scattering over that lengthscale. However, it was argued by Simánek that most of the spin-accumulation is suppressed by the spin tracking the rotating magnetisation rather well, as the system is not far from being adiabatic [199] -the mistracking of spins in Co with a Larmor wavelength of only a fewÅ is unlikely to be very great when the wall thickness is 150Å. Ni wires were compared with Co by same group, the effect in Ni was found to be one order of magnitude smaller [300].…”
Section: Mesoscopic Devicesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was based on models of the CPP mode of GMR, where spins will accumulate over that distance as they enter an oppositely polarised ferromagnetic layer [76], leading to bulk spin dependent scattering over that lengthscale. However, it was argued by Simánek that most of the spin-accumulation is suppressed by the spin tracking the rotating magnetisation rather well, as the system is not far from being adiabatic [199] -the mistracking of spins in Co with a Larmor wavelength of only a fewÅ is unlikely to be very great when the wall thickness is 150Å. Ni wires were compared with Co by same group, the effect in Ni was found to be one order of magnitude smaller [300].…”
Section: Mesoscopic Devicesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Dzero et al also looked at the role of spin accumulation in generating domain wall resistance (in the limit of a ballistic wall) and found even-odd effects in the number of walls in a nanowire, so long as all the walls are within a spin diffusion length of their neighbours [198]. This type of spin accumulation was put forward as a possible explanation for the very large MR observed by Ebels et al in a Co nanowire [90], although the calculation ofSimánek showed that a large part of the spinaccumulation is suppressed by the spin tracking the rotating magnetisation [199]. (Dzero et al also examined the depolarising effects of a wall-either Bloch or Néel-of finite thickness and found that the results of Ebels et al could not be explained by their theory: as a result they proposed a new type of wall geometry, which they dubbed the linear wall, details of which remain unpublished.)…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, other conflicting theories of DWR predict negative resistance [16] or a contribution that can have either sign [17]. Unusually high DWR values were found in epitaxial Co wires at 77 K [18], which was attributed to the spin flip length being much larger than the width of the DW leading to spin accumulation at the DW, although it was later argued that this is not sufficient to explain their results [19]. Despite this considerable progress during the past years, the width of the DW, which is obviously a crucial parameter in fundamentally unraveling the origin of DWR, could never be changed systematically in experiments on DW resistivity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…͑9͒, as given in the last column of Table I. In the case of the mechanisms listed in the first line of Table I, the wall-resistance theory appears to be that of Simanek,12 with…”
Section: Wall Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%