1999
DOI: 10.1007/s100530050403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spin correlations in $e^+e^-\to 4$ jets

Abstract: Existence of discrepancies between experimental data and Monte Carlo predictions for angular distributions in four-jet production via e + e − annihilation has been known for some time at LEP1. As such QCD processes constitute significant backgrounds to e + e − → W + W − → 4-jet production at LEP2, we consider the possibility that an erroneous modelling of the helicity structure of the finalstate partons could affect the accuracy of experimental measurements of the W ± boson parameters.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An example of such a combination, although performed for the SM Higgs boson searches at LHC, can be found in [37]. Concluding the above summary of previous results, the most competitive search channel to the study presented in this work is the one studied in [27,28] whose results are compared in detail with those of this study in a separated section.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…An example of such a combination, although performed for the SM Higgs boson searches at LHC, can be found in [37]. Concluding the above summary of previous results, the most competitive search channel to the study presented in this work is the one studied in [27,28] whose results are compared in detail with those of this study in a separated section.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Therefore the analysis is based on the on-shell production of charged Higgs bosons and the possible off-shell production is not considered here as it may not change the results very much. This is an expectation inspired from [27,28].…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations