Frontiers of Biological Energetics 1978
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-225402-4.50060-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spin-Probe—spin-Label Investigations of Model Membranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3. Judging from previous work, this is not unexpected since polar moieties like the nitroxide attached near the terminal position of the chain result in a "bending back" of that position to the aqueous surface (15,22). Thus n-doxyl PCs with nitroxides near the chain terminus should be used with caution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3. Judging from previous work, this is not unexpected since polar moieties like the nitroxide attached near the terminal position of the chain result in a "bending back" of that position to the aqueous surface (15,22). Thus n-doxyl PCs with nitroxides near the chain terminus should be used with caution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For two paramagnetic reagents with similar sizes, the ratio of the exchange rates with a given nitroxide is independent of steric factors and would depend on distance through the concentration gradient only. The interaction of fast-relaxing paramagnetic reagents such as 02 and NiAA with nitroxides in fluid media is dominated by Heisenberg exchange and produces changes in the spin-lattice relaxation time (T1) proportional to We,, (15). The experimental quantity AP1/2 is related to the exchange rate according to AP1/2°c WeX/T*2, RESULTS A structural model of bR based on electron diffraction (16) and earlier EPR results (1) is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current literature data on cancer detection with EPR suggests that 16-doxyl stearic acid (16-DS) should be used for the study of conformational changes of HSA, due to its structural congruence with HSA and the position of the nitroxide group at the terminal part of the FA chain, also claiming that 16-DS is highly specific for HSA. However, many studies have shown that when FAs, labeled with the doxyl group located at different positions on the carbon chain, are bound to albumin, the doxyl group of the 16-DS is located in a more polar and less fixed environment than that of the 5-doxyl stearic acid (5-DS). , There is nothing special in the binding of 16-DS to HSA; quite to the contrary, it may have some disadvantages over using other SLFAs, e.g., 5-DS. Namely, studies of incorporation of 16-DS to artificial and natural membranes clearly indicated that 16-DS may “bend-back” to the aqueous surface, so that the polar nitroxide group on the C-16 atom is not located inside the membrane. This suggests that the same bending effect may occur during the binding of 16-DS to HSA subdomains so that the polar label on C-16 is out. Indeed, the study of the accessibility of different SLFAs bound to bovine serum albumin (BSA) has shown that 16-DS is more accessible to water-soluble ferricyanide than 5-DS, suggesting that it protrudes from the protein’s hydrophobic pocket …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%