1997
DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spinal cord injuries in Arkansas due to violence: 1980 – 1989

Abstract: In some areas of the US the incidence of violence-related spinal cord injuries (SCIs) is double or triple that of 10 years ago. The purpose of this study was to determine if this trend is evident in Arkansas, a small rural state. For the study period 15.3% of traumatic SCIs identi®ed in Arkansas were violence-related. The overall incidence rate of traumatic SCIs in Arkansas declined from 41.11 per million in 1980 to 33.18 per million in 1989. However, the rate of violence-related SCIs rose from 3.5 per million… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference in the two groups concerning age and gender ratio are similar to those reported in the literature, 12,8 while concerning the aetiology it reflects the social context with similar causes for traumatic SCL as for other Western countries apart from violence. 7,13 The NT group, although with possible selection bias from the recruitment sources, also shows similar aetiologies to those found in other papers. 10,8,7 The prevalence of cervical lesions (34%) is in the lower bracket of the range of findings reported in the literature (38-51%) 14,11,9 with a higher probability OR=odds ratio, CI=confidence interval 95%; NK=not known; DVT=deep venous thrombosis of risk for cervical injury being of T than NT aetiology, as already reported.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The difference in the two groups concerning age and gender ratio are similar to those reported in the literature, 12,8 while concerning the aetiology it reflects the social context with similar causes for traumatic SCL as for other Western countries apart from violence. 7,13 The NT group, although with possible selection bias from the recruitment sources, also shows similar aetiologies to those found in other papers. 10,8,7 The prevalence of cervical lesions (34%) is in the lower bracket of the range of findings reported in the literature (38-51%) 14,11,9 with a higher probability OR=odds ratio, CI=confidence interval 95%; NK=not known; DVT=deep venous thrombosis of risk for cervical injury being of T than NT aetiology, as already reported.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…8 This is a low incidence as compared to the USA, where incidence rates among adults range from 28 to 54.8/million/year. 9 Since 1994, a collaboration group representing all university hospitals in Sweden have developed a matrix for documentation and quality assessment of SCI care. 8 In 1998, 106 cases of traumatic SCI were thus documented, equaling an incidence of traumatic SCI of 12/million/year.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%