2020
DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000003377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spinal Stenosis Grading in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks

Abstract: Study Design. Retrospective magnetic resonance imaging grading with comparison between experts and deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Objective. This study aims to verify the feasibility of a computer-assisted spine stenosis grading system by comparing the diagnostic agreement between two experts and the agreement between the experts and trained artificial CNN classifiers. Summary of Background Data. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditional machine learning algorithms mainly include two steps: feature extraction and classification. In the part of feature extraction, this study selects five most advanced global algorithms for texture representation, namely local binary patterns (LBPs) [ 2 ], local phase quantization (LPQ) [ 12 ], gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) [ 3 ], histogram of oriented gradient (HOG), and oriented fast and rotated brief (ORB) [ 4 ]. The feature dimensions of the five feature descriptors are shown in Table 3 .…”
Section: Model Experiments and Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Traditional machine learning algorithms mainly include two steps: feature extraction and classification. In the part of feature extraction, this study selects five most advanced global algorithms for texture representation, namely local binary patterns (LBPs) [ 2 ], local phase quantization (LPQ) [ 12 ], gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) [ 3 ], histogram of oriented gradient (HOG), and oriented fast and rotated brief (ORB) [ 4 ]. The feature dimensions of the five feature descriptors are shown in Table 3 .…”
Section: Model Experiments and Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Opioids are common analgesics. Although they have certain analgesic effects, the use of opioids alone in large doses is easy to produce drug tolerance, accompanied by many adverse reactions, resulting in low pain control effect and control satisfaction [ 2 ]. The application and development of multimodal analgesia nursing provide an effective guarantee for clinical analgesia nursing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, our study is the first to externally validate a comprehensive software solution that focuses on the diagnosis of clinically relevant degenerative changes such as disc herniation and nerve root compression, in addition to the sole graduation of single degenerative changes. Our approach differs from most preliminary studies since it can process both axial and sagittal slices of lumbar MRIs, leading to markedly enhanced detection rates of spinal pathologies compared to the aforementioned study by Jamaludin et al and a recent study by Won et al (e.g., in case of spinal canal stenosis, our accuracy was 98% vs. 95% vs. 83%, respectively) [ 37 ], even though direct comparison of the methods on different data sets is methodologically difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A strength of this study was its clear establishment of the ground truth by the presence or absence of cervical OPLL on CT. To create the deep learning algorithm, determination of the ground truth is a critical issue. For example, Won et al created a convolution neural network (CNN) to classify lumbar canal stenosis severity into four grades 11 . Although their study was informative, the study methodology and results were complex; two radiologists assessed lumbar canal stenosis on magnetic resonance imaging independently, and two types of CNNs were investigated using the radiological findings determined by the radiologists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%