1981
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/196.2.209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spindown of neutron stars in close binary systems - II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
201
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(208 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
201
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One can note that the magnetic dipole moment µ and the accretion rateṀ c always appear in the same combination, y =Ṁ c µ 2 , as was first noticed by Davies & Pringle (1981). Analysis of the nature of interaction of a magnetized star with the surrounding plasma allows us to write an approximate evolution equation for the angular momentum of a magnetic rotator in the general form (Lipunov (1982a)) dIω dt =Ṁk su − κ t µ 2 R 3 t , where k su is a specific angular momentum applied by the accretion matter to the rotator and R t is a radius of the interaction.…”
supporting
confidence: 68%
“…One can note that the magnetic dipole moment µ and the accretion rateṀ c always appear in the same combination, y =Ṁ c µ 2 , as was first noticed by Davies & Pringle (1981). Analysis of the nature of interaction of a magnetized star with the surrounding plasma allows us to write an approximate evolution equation for the angular momentum of a magnetic rotator in the general form (Lipunov (1982a)) dIω dt =Ṁk su − κ t µ 2 R 3 t , where k su is a specific angular momentum applied by the accretion matter to the rotator and R t is a radius of the interaction.…”
supporting
confidence: 68%
“…Davies & Pringle 1981;Henrichs 1983). Four distinct phases of neutron star spindown in close binary systems have been proposed to be applicable to a particular range of rotation periods: pulsar-like, very rapid rotator, supersonic propeller, and subsonic propeller (Davies & Pringle 1981).…”
Section: X-ray Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Davies & Pringle 1981;Henrichs 1983). Four distinct phases of neutron star spindown in close binary systems have been proposed to be applicable to a particular range of rotation periods: pulsar-like, very rapid rotator, supersonic propeller, and subsonic propeller (Davies & Pringle 1981). According to these long-period neutron stars such as SAX J2103.5+4545 achieve the most effective braking during the subsonic propeller regimen, in which the rotational rate decelerates because of the interaction between the magnetosphere and the surrounding hot, quasi-static plasma envelope (Ikhsanov & Choi 2006).…”
Section: X-ray Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a pre-low-mass X-ray Binary (pre-LMXB: see above), the newborn, fast-rotating neutron star is unable at first to accrete the matter that is being transferred from the companion through the inner Lagrangian point L 1 , because of the fast rotation of the neutron star (IS75, Davies et al 1979;Davies & Pringle 1981;Illarionov & Kompaneets 1990;Mineshige et al 1991;Illarionov et al 1993, G95, LRB99;Romanova et al 2004, RUKL05, UKRL06). Because of its large angular momentum, this matter forms an accretion disk and reaches the magnetospheric boundary of the magnetized neutron star, whereupon this ionized matter interacts with the fast-rotating neutron star's magnetic field, and the energy and angular momentum deposited in it by magnetic stresses associated with this fast-rotating magnetic field expel it.…”
Section: Propeller Phase In Pre-lmxbsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 6.67 h periodicity is identified in our model with the orbital period of the binary. In our model the young neutron star is still spinning very rapidly, with a canonical spin period ∼10−100 ms, and is operating in the "propeller" regime, wherein any matter approaching the fast-rotating magnetosphere of the neutron star is expelled by the energy and angular momentum deposited into it through its interaction with the magnetospheric boundary (Illarionov & Sunyaev 1975, henceforth IS75;Davies et al 1979;Davies & Pringle 1981;Illarionov & Kompaneets 1990; Article published by EDP Sciences Mineshige et al 1991;Illarionov et al 1993;Ghosh 1995, and references therein, henceforth G95; Lovelace et al 1999, henceforth LRB99; Romanova et al 2004Romanova et al , 2005, henceforth RUKL05; Ustyugova et al 2006, henceforth UKRL06).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%