2021
DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2020.3025087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SpineParseNet: Spine Parsing for Volumetric MR Image by a Two-Stage Segmentation Framework With Semantic Image Representation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the segmentation results (89.8% DSC) are not impressive, indicating that the ISA approach is likely to be misclassified. SpineParseNet [31] achieved a mean DSC of 87.3%, but several limitations exist in this work. First, it performed inferior segmentation due to the blurry boundary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the segmentation results (89.8% DSC) are not impressive, indicating that the ISA approach is likely to be misclassified. SpineParseNet [31] achieved a mean DSC of 87.3%, but several limitations exist in this work. First, it performed inferior segmentation due to the blurry boundary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Vertebrae localization and identification method in CT images are proposed in [37] by combining short and longrange contextual information in a supervised manner to develop a multi-task 3D FCN. A two-stage multi-class segmentation architecture based on a 3D graph convolutional segmentation network (GCSN) for 3D coarse segmentation and a 2D residual U-Net (ResUNet) for 2D segmentation refinement model is presented in [31], but several limitations exist in these works. Inferior segmentation is produced due to the blurry boundary, and it came at a high computational cost due to its complex network model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) [60], Jaccard similarity coefficient (JSC) [61], precision (PRE), and sensitivity (SEN) were used as quantitative assessment metrics to evaluate segmentation performance [20,29]. We evaluated true positives (TP), true negatives (TN), false positives (FP), and false negatives (FN) by comparing the true labels with predicted labels:…”
Section: Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, they may be unable to handle more complicated cases where spine pathologies and curvatures are present. In recent years, deep learning has become a research hotspot in medical image analysis [18] because of its high feature extraction ability [19][20][21][22][23][24]. Deep neural networks (DNNs) often use successful tools as an extractor of high-level features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the methods mentioned above are relatively simple to implement, using these manual segmentation methods to segment small organs in the CT volumes is time-consuming and not task-specific [ 11 ], which requires a sophisticated knowledge base of anatomy. In addition, small organ segmentation tasks require high precision, and in that case, these traditional methods are not suitable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%