We study the possibility for a unitary theory of partially-massless (PM) spintwo field interacting with Gravity in arbitrary dimensions. We show that the gauge and parity invariant interaction of PM spin two particles requires the inclusion of specific massive spin-two fields and leads to a reconstruction of Conformal Gravity, or multiple copies of the latter in even dimensions. By relaxing the parity invariance, we find a possibility of a unitary theory in four dimensions, but this theory cannot be constructed in the standard formulation, due to the absence of the parity-odd cubic vertex therein. Finally, by relaxing the general covariance, we show that a "non-geometric" coupling between massless and PM spin-two fields may lead to an alternative possibility of a unitary theory. We also clarify some aspects of interactions between massless, partially-massless and massive fields, and resolve disagreements in the literature.
C PM Coupling to matter 38-i -
6. Postponing the justification of why 1 We will call PM gravity any unitary theory of gravity that involves PM spin-two field. 2 In [5], the authors require unitarity of the corresponding representation. We will use a looser form of admissibility condition, allowing non-unitary theories in general, even though our eventual goal is to understand the possibility of unitary theories. We will show, that even without the requirement of unitarity, the admissibility condition puts very strong restrictions on the space of possible theories.is composed of only gauge fields whose Killing tensors correspond to the generators of the symmetries. In this way, the finiteness of the dimension of the symmetry algebras implies the finiteness of the number of fields in the theories. In fact, there is no strong reason that there should be only gauge fields. Indeed, a good example is Vasiliev's higherspin gravity: the theory also requires a scalar field in the field content, which has no 3 By this definition, the depth is the number of derivatives in the gauge transformation of PM field, which is different from [12]. 4 See, e.g., Wikipedia: Gelfand-Kirillov dimension. 5 This does not rule out non-linear realisations of global symmetries. An interesting recent example was provided in [14], a special Galileon theory in (A)dS d+1 with extended symmetry (a real form of) sl d+2 , which is the k = 1 case of the PM HS algebras of [12] mentioned above. The no-go statement here refers to the possibility of gauging these algebras and realising their global action linearly on the fields.