2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.92.201107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spiraling Fermi arcs in Weyl materials

Abstract: In Weyl materials the valence and conduction electron bands touch at an even number of isolated points in the Brillouin zone. In the vicinity of these points the electron dispersion is linear and may be described by the massless Dirac equation. This results in nontrivial topology of Berry connection curvature. One of its consequences is the existence of peculiar surface electron states whose Fermi surfaces form arcs connecting projections of the Weyl points onto the surface plane. Band bending near the boundar… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
97
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
6
97
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the phonon drag effect influences the Seebeck coefficient much more than the mobility [54]. On the other hand, the assumption of the equilibrium phonon distribution is used widely, in deriving phenomenological scattering models as well as in other first-principles-based efforts [35,46], and in general, this assumption has been working well. (iii) Renormalization of the electron energy due to the EPI is usually much smaller than the dominant energy scale in our study, which is the energy bandgap.…”
Section: Limitations Of Presented First-principles Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the phonon drag effect influences the Seebeck coefficient much more than the mobility [54]. On the other hand, the assumption of the equilibrium phonon distribution is used widely, in deriving phenomenological scattering models as well as in other first-principles-based efforts [35,46], and in general, this assumption has been working well. (iii) Renormalization of the electron energy due to the EPI is usually much smaller than the dominant energy scale in our study, which is the energy bandgap.…”
Section: Limitations Of Presented First-principles Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques have since then been widely used to investigate EPI and to compute thermoelectric properties [37][38][39] and electron mean free path (MFP) spectra [39] in silicon as well as the electrical resistivity in graphene [40][41][42] under RTA. Such density-functional-theory-based (DFT-based) treatment can also be employed to compute electron mobility in weakly polar materials such as transition metal dichalcogenides [43][44][45][46] and perovskites [47,48], in which RTA still works due to the suppression of LO-phonon scatterings by strong dielectric screening. For strongly polar materials, like GaAs, the long-range information originating from polar-optical-phonon and piezoelectric interactions in e-ph coupling matrices are lost during the Wannier interpolation [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transport properties such as electrical and thermal conductivities and thermoelectric coefficients can be computed either within the RTA or with numerical solutions of the BTE that explicitly include the scattering integral. The BTE can be solved beyond the RTA using iterative [65,66] and Monte Carlo approaches, among others.…”
Section: Boltzmann Transport Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, by implementing the Wannier-Fourier interpolation scheme, accurate electronic energies, phonon frequencies, and el-ph coupling matrix elements can be obtained with reasonable computational burden. Within this scheme, the electronic Hamiltonian [30] 2800 [38] D 3d ZA, TA [38] Silicene 2 × 10 5 [29] 2100, [36] 1200, [37] 750 [38] D 3d ZA, [36,38] TA [38] Graphene (2-3) × 10 5 , 3 × 10 5 , [24] 1 × 10 5 [27] (2-3) × 10 5 , 2 × 10 5 , [25] 1.5 × 10 5 [36] D 6h LA [25] α-Graphyne 3 × 10 4 [31] 1.6 × 10 4 [25] D 2h LA [25] Monolayer MoS 2 72-200 [32] 400, [36] 130, [37] 410, [50] 150, [52] 230 [51] D 3h LA, [37,50] LO 2 [50] Figure 5. The classification of nonplanarity for a) stanene and b) monolayer MoS 2 .…”
Section: Charge Carrier Mobility and Electron-phonon Couplingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Buckling in the hexagonal honeycomb structure of stanene, originating from the sp 2 -sp 3 orbital hybridization, [47][48][49] can lead to remarkable difference from the planar structures such as graphene or graphynes, where huge intrinsic mobility ≈10 5 cm 2 V −1 s −1 has been predicted. [22] We note that the mobility in nonplanar structured monolayer MoS 2 was found to be 150-410 cm 2 V −1 s −1 [32,37,[50][51][52] and phosphorene to be 170-460 cm 2 V −1 s −1 . [53,54] It is thus intriguing to look at the contribution of each phonon mode to carrier transport and to compare with DPA for the buckled stanene layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%