Optical Microlithography XXI 2008
DOI: 10.1117/12.774104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Split and design guidelines for double patterning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, a stitch is known to be highly sensitive to the overlay error, causing bridging or pinching. synthesis/manufacturing [8], [14], [17], but cannot be effectively addressed due to their high design dependency.…”
Section: B Challenges In Dptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Unfortunately, a stitch is known to be highly sensitive to the overlay error, causing bridging or pinching. synthesis/manufacturing [8], [14], [17], but cannot be effectively addressed due to their high design dependency.…”
Section: B Challenges In Dptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To bridge the gap between current immersion lithography and again-delayed EUV lithography, double patterning technology (DPT) receives large attention from industry and is regarded as a technically and practically viable alternative to achieve high resolution for 32/22nm nodes [1], [7], [8], [11], [13], [14], [17]. The key idea of DPT is to decompose a single layout into two masks in order to increase pitch size and improve depth of focus (DOF) [9], [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Stitches will cause yield loss and increase manufacturing cost due to overlay errors, which is 5 nm or 6 nm under current 32 nm double patterning lithography. Some mask misalignment direction [4] could be actually beneficial for printability. However, on the presence of various process uncertainties, such as dose, focus, and mask errors, the printed stitch width could be easily smaller than 25 nm and result in design failure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%