2018
DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2018.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Split-brain patients: Visual biases for faces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because visual images presented in a unilateral visual field are primarily processed in the contralateral hemisphere 24 , we compared the RT required to detect normal expressions and anti-expressions between intact- and resected-hemisphere stimulation conditions. This visual half-field paradigm has been shown to effectively reveal the emotional and social processing profiles in one hemisphere of healthy participants 25 31 , split-brain patients 32 36 , and patients with unilateral medial temporal structure resection 37 , 38 . To confirm the emotional impact of normal expressions and anti-expressions, we also obtained subjective ratings of the stimuli from the patients, in terms of valence and arousal, and also investigated familiarity and naturalness as possible cognitive confounding factors 39 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because visual images presented in a unilateral visual field are primarily processed in the contralateral hemisphere 24 , we compared the RT required to detect normal expressions and anti-expressions between intact- and resected-hemisphere stimulation conditions. This visual half-field paradigm has been shown to effectively reveal the emotional and social processing profiles in one hemisphere of healthy participants 25 31 , split-brain patients 32 36 , and patients with unilateral medial temporal structure resection 37 , 38 . To confirm the emotional impact of normal expressions and anti-expressions, we also obtained subjective ratings of the stimuli from the patients, in terms of valence and arousal, and also investigated familiarity and naturalness as possible cognitive confounding factors 39 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence of split-brain research in patients with drug-refractory epilepsy after callosotomy (ie, surgical dissection of CC), the initial assumption of hemispherical independence was replaced by the concept of asymmetric localisation of functional domains within the bilaterally organised brain 3. While historically the term ‘split-brain’ applied to patients after callosotomy,4 nowadays it refers more generally to the state after isolated (ie, not affecting adjacent regions) functional disruption of the callosal connections. Callosal lesions can be provoked by various etiologies (eg, neoplastic, vitamin B1 deficiency, cytotoxic non-ischaemic, vascular).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Splenial lesions result in hemialexia and optic aphasia regarding information presented in the left visual field 8. These disconnection symptoms are understood to be the result of an imbalance in the interhemispheric information exchange via the CC and the other cerebral commissures 4…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At a neurophysiological level, the behavioral preference for the use of one side of the body corresponds to a contralateral hemispheric superiority in motor control, due to the crossed motor (and sensory) nervous pathways in humans [12]. This means that if a person is strongly right-lateralized (right-hander), her/his left hemisphere is more competent than the right hemisphere either in fine motor control, or in strength, or in both of them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%