2009 IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference 2009
DOI: 10.1109/cicc.2009.5280859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Split capacitor DAC mismatch calibration in successive approximation ADC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The split-array topology was adopted to reduce area and dynamic power consumption. A static latched comparator was selected to minimize the kickback noise [14]. By controlling two switches connected each at top and bottom plate of the crDAC ( SW TOP and SW BOT ) with the right sequence described in Fig.…”
Section: Noise Shapingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The split-array topology was adopted to reduce area and dynamic power consumption. A static latched comparator was selected to minimize the kickback noise [14]. By controlling two switches connected each at top and bottom plate of the crDAC ( SW TOP and SW BOT ) with the right sequence described in Fig.…”
Section: Noise Shapingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another technique in the design that significantly reduces total capacitance is the use of split capacitor [6]. Split capacitor has its own drawback, that the capacitive structure is quite sensitive to the parasitic capacitance of the top plate of the bridge capacitor to ground, which can destroy the INL and DNL, thus the dynamic performance.…”
Section: Techniques For Small Total Capacitancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Several other techniques have also been proposed to reduce the total capacitance of a C-DAC. Capacitor calibration techniques compensate for capacitor mismatch in the foreground 9 or background. 10 These calibration techniques correct errors by using digital postprocessing at the cost of additional power consumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%