2011
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-2011-05187-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Splitting and gluing lemmas for geodesically equivalent pseudo-Riemannian metrics

Abstract: Abstract. Two metrics g andḡ are geodesically equivalent if they share the same (unparameterized) geodesics. We introduce two constructions that allow one to reduce many natural problems related to geodesically equivalent metrics, such as the classification of local normal forms and the Lie problem (the description of projective vector fields), to the case when the (1, 1)−tensor G i j := g ikḡ kj has one real eigenvalue, or two complex conjugate eigenvalues, and give first applications. As a part of the proof … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
82
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in the case of complex conjugate eigenvalues λ Segre type [4] Segre type [3,1] Segre type [2,2] Segre type [2,1,1] Segre type indicates the number and sizes of Jordan blocks with the same eigenvalue λ.…”
Section: Classification Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…in the case of complex conjugate eigenvalues λ Segre type [4] Segre type [3,1] Segre type [2,2] Segre type [2,1,1] Segre type indicates the number and sizes of Jordan blocks with the same eigenvalue λ.…”
Section: Classification Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lemma 1 (Splitting Lemma, [2]). Let L be an affinor with zero Nijenhuis torsion on a manifold M, dimM = n. Suppose there exists a (non-holonomic) frame in which L takes block diagonal form,…”
Section: The Splitting Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The pair (const ·g, C 1 a+ C 2 g + C 3 λ⊗ λ) determines the foliations corresponding to the coordinate plaques (x 1 , x 2 ), x (2) ,. .…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%