2008
DOI: 10.1109/msp.2008.918413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spoken language understanding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples of statistical approaches to various components of a dialogue system can be found in (Levin and Pieraccini, 1997;Jurafsky and Martin, 2008;De Mori et al, 2008;Thomson and Young, 2010;Lemon and Pietquin, 2012; Figure 1: Architecture of a modular Spoken Dialoug System. et al, 2013;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of statistical approaches to various components of a dialogue system can be found in (Levin and Pieraccini, 1997;Jurafsky and Martin, 2008;De Mori et al, 2008;Thomson and Young, 2010;Lemon and Pietquin, 2012; Figure 1: Architecture of a modular Spoken Dialoug System. et al, 2013;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The task-oriented SDS is usually domain-specific. The system creators first map the user utterances into semantic frames that contain domain-specific slots and intents using spoken language understanding (SLU) (De Mori et al, 2008). Then a set of domain-specific dialog state variables is tracked to retain the context information over turns (Williams et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of an SLU system is to interpret the meaning of a speech signal (De Mori et al, 2008). SLU systems use Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) to convert speech signal to the text of what was spoken (hypothesis), followed by semantic meaning extraction from the ASR hypothesis using Natural Language Processing (NLP).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%