2011
DOI: 10.1097/mao.0b013e31820d9613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spoken Word Recognition in Adolescent Cochlear Implant Users During Quiet and Multispeaker Babble Conditions

Abstract: Objective-To assess overall speech intelligibility in adolescent cochlear implanted speakers during quiet and multi-speaker babble conditions. Study design-A cross sectional assessment of intelligibility incorporating group (auditory-oral versus total communication speakers), sentence context (high versus low contexts) and background conditions (quiet versus multi-speaker babble).Setting-A camp designed to assess adolescents over a concentrated period of time. Participants: 57 adolescents who participated in a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides music, simultaneous speech signals often occur in everyday life. CI subjects have great difficulty understanding multiple speakers (17). Improving polyphonic pitch perception may also be helpful in this aspect.…”
Section: Implications and Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides music, simultaneous speech signals often occur in everyday life. CI subjects have great difficulty understanding multiple speakers (17). Improving polyphonic pitch perception may also be helpful in this aspect.…”
Section: Implications and Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the influence of these factors was removed from the analysis, language outcomes were associated with cognitive variables, including better working memory (i.e., digit span) and faster verbal rehearsal speed (i.e., sentence repetition rate). Speech intelligibility appeared strongly associated with exposure to environments where speaking and listening were included as integral pieces of the therapeutic regime (Fink et al, 2007; Tobey et al, 2011a; Tobey et al, 2011b). Students who relied on sign to improve their vocabulary comprehension typically exhibited poorer English language outcomes than children whose spoken language comprehension paralleled or exceeded their comprehension of speech + sign.…”
Section: Scientific Thrustsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to the first aspect listed above, most DHH children who use cochlear implant(s) (CI) or hearing aid(s) (HA) typically show speech perception close to 100% (Geers et al., 2003; van Wieringen & Wouters, 2015). However, the limits of technology involve a difficult perception of speech in conditions, such as the presence of background noise (Yang et al., 2012), an increased distance from the sound source (Whitmal & Poissant, 2009), an intensity of the primary signal below device threshold (Davidson et al., 2014), and when the number of communication partners involved in an interaction increases (Tobey et al., 2011). These factors reduce the quantity of words and sentences the child can hear and understand (van Wieringen & Wouters, 2015; Yang et al., 2012) and may negatively affect the opportunity to “overhear” speech and prevent consistent access to auditory linguistic information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%