The increase in lifespan in western society has led to a consequent increase of osteoporosis substantially decreasing quality of life and increasing healthcare costs and the need for additional therapeutic strategies. Even obesity, a major health issue in industrialized countries, has recently been associated to deteriorated bone microarchitecture and increased prevalence of vertebral fractures [8]. Currently approved therapeutic options to treat osteoporosis are several and include the estrogen replacement therapy, the use of selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) such as raloxifene, the bisphosphonates (e.g., alendronate, risedronate, ibandronate, and zoledronic acid), calcitonin, recombinant human parathyroid hormone (rhPTH) and its derivatives (e.g., teriparatide), the monoclonal antibody denosumab that binds the receptor activator of nuclear factor κ-B ligand (RANKL), and strontium ranelate (not approved in the United States) [9,10]. However, there are particularly challenging categories of osteoporotic patients that show an inadequate response to therapy and patients with pre-existing conditions, such as renal or gastrointestinal diseases, that may not tolerate the existing therapies [11]. Indeed, most of the drugs currently available present contraindications and even severe side effects. For example, biphosphonates, that represent often the first-choice therapy for osteoporosis, although effective in reducing bone loss and vertebral