2010
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1245216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spontaneous Closure of Macular Hole Following Rhegmatogenous Macula-Off Retinal Detachment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…10 There have been fewer cases of spontaneous closure observed in vitrectomized eyes, with the original reason for vitrectomy including MH, vitreous hemorrhage, central retinal vein occlusion, and macula-involving RRD. 6,7,11,12 Once again, in none of the previous reports did the FTMH re-open as fast as in our patient.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…10 There have been fewer cases of spontaneous closure observed in vitrectomized eyes, with the original reason for vitrectomy including MH, vitreous hemorrhage, central retinal vein occlusion, and macula-involving RRD. 6,7,11,12 Once again, in none of the previous reports did the FTMH re-open as fast as in our patient.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…The majority of these cases undergo repair with scleral buckle or pneumatic retinopexy and are thus not vitrectomized. 17 In the rare cases of MH formation after pars plana vitrectomy for RRD repair, the majority of patients had macula-involving RRDs. In contrast, our patient had a macula-sparing RRD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…5 Spontaneous closure of postvitrectomy macular holes has been reported before, 6,7 but no reports have been made of spontaneous resolution of a postvitrectomy macular hole retinal detachment. 5 Spontaneous closure of postvitrectomy macular holes has been reported before, 6,7 but no reports have been made of spontaneous resolution of a postvitrectomy macular hole retinal detachment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%