“…In the case of visualization methods, Small-angle x-ray and neutron scattering (SAXS and SANS) that were used in the study, the SDL is measured from own experiments. 49,63,64 Uncertainty in true size Transmission electron microscopy Cryo-TEM 0.1 Size, lamellarity, morphology Structure preservation Freezing artifacts 49,65 Uncertainty in bilayer thickness Scanning electron miscroscopy Freeze fracture Cryo-SEM 2 Size, lamellarity, morphology 3D appearance Freezing artifacts 66,67 Scanning electron microscopy Environmental SEM 30 Size, lamellarity, morphology, concentration Native environment Poor resolution 40,60,68 Electromagnetic manipulation methods Scanning probe microscopy 3D information High sensitivity to vibration Scanning probe microscopy Atomic force microscopy 1 Size, topology, elastic properties Sensitivity Shape alteration upon attachment 37,40,54,60,69 Scanning force microscopy Amphiphile adsorption on cantilever Scanning probe microscopy Scannig tunneling microscopy 0.1 Size, topology No mechanical contact to sample Cantilever tip condition crucial 70,71 Nuclear magnetic resonance P 31 -nuclear magnetic resonance Lamellarity High accuracy Signal decrease due to convenient buffer [72][73][74] Electron paramagnetic resonance Encapsulation, bilayer flexibility, 40,75,76 Electron spin resonance bilayer polarity, lamellarity Specific to unpaired electrons Signal decrease due to water Laser doppler electrophoresis Zeta potential, surface charge potential Fast Calibration required frequently 77,78 Optical 54,86 ever care has to be taken when interpreting polydisperse samples, which are the case with most polymers and most preparation methods. Small-angle X-ray 33 or neutron scattering (SAXS or SANS; resolution limit of both: 0.5 nm) 34 provide detailed information about the polymersome bilayer 35 , but due to the need for access to large scale radiation facilities, their use for routine measurem...…”