2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.09.090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spontaneous osteogenesis of MSCs cultured on 3D microcarriers through alteration of cytoskeletal tension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

8
56
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
8
56
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Simply moving from 2D to 3D milieus, even under static culture, may have vital effects on integrin-mediated focal adhesion, cytoskeletal structure and tension, gene expression, and differentiation. [106][107][108][109] This results from complex 3D cell-cell interaction and communication; altered transport phenomena for media, nutrient, and growth factors; and difference in cell-matrix binding in 3D versus 2D. 110 These differences may be even magnified under external mechanical stimulations.…”
Section: Stretching 2d Versus 3d Constructsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Simply moving from 2D to 3D milieus, even under static culture, may have vital effects on integrin-mediated focal adhesion, cytoskeletal structure and tension, gene expression, and differentiation. [106][107][108][109] This results from complex 3D cell-cell interaction and communication; altered transport phenomena for media, nutrient, and growth factors; and difference in cell-matrix binding in 3D versus 2D. 110 These differences may be even magnified under external mechanical stimulations.…”
Section: Stretching 2d Versus 3d Constructsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Various 3D culture systems have been developed, such as cell spheroids for studying tumor behaviors [3,4], microcarrier culture for proliferating stem cell [5][6][7], tissue-engineered scaffolds for modeling bone marrow niches [8] and cell encapsulation for cell-based transplantation therapies [9][10][11]. Among these 3D systems, encapsulating cells into suitable scaffolds has attracted increasing attention due to some advantages, including ease of handling, highly hydrated tissue-like microenvironment and uniform cell distribution [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have indicated that various types of microcarriers can support the growth of MSCs on their surfaces, including polystyrene [10], glass [11], decellularized adipose tissue [12], gelatin [6,13e18] and dextran [9,19,20]. The most commonly used microcarriers in MSC cultures are Cultispher S (macroporous gelatin), Cytodex 1 (positively charged dextran beads) and Cytodex 3 (collagencoated dextran beads).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%