2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.82.104416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spontaneous symmetry breaking in a generalized orbital compass model

Abstract: We introduce a generalized two-dimensional orbital compass model, which interpolates continuously from the classical Ising model to the orbital compass model with frustrated quantum interactions, and investigate it using the multiscale entanglement renormalization ansatz (MERA). The results demonstrate that increasing frustration of exchange interactions triggers a second order quantum phase transition to a degenerate symmetry broken state which minimizes one of the interactions in the orbital compass model. U… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
69
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
4
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the latter case the operators include just one of the orthogonal pseudospin components at each bond and are Ising-like. This form of interactions is found as well in the compass models [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39], and in the Kitaev model on the honeycomb lattice [40][41][42]. The interactions that are considered here are defined by the pseudospin operators T γ i for two active orbitals (for T = 1/2), and we define them as linear combinations of the Pauli matrices {σ These operators define the generalized compass model (GCM) considered in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the latter case the operators include just one of the orthogonal pseudospin components at each bond and are Ising-like. This form of interactions is found as well in the compass models [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39], and in the Kitaev model on the honeycomb lattice [40][41][42]. The interactions that are considered here are defined by the pseudospin operators T γ i for two active orbitals (for T = 1/2), and we define them as linear combinations of the Pauli matrices {σ These operators define the generalized compass model (GCM) considered in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…This frustration increases gradually with increasing angle θ when the model Eq. (1.3) interpolates between the Ising model at θ = 0 to the quantum compass model (QCM) at θ = π/2 [35]. The latter is also called the 1D Kitaev model by some authors [42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With increasing angle θ, frustration gradually increases when the model Eq. (1) interpolates between the Ising model at θ = 0 and the quantum compass model (QCM) at θ = π/2, in analogy to the 2D compass model [47]. The model was solved exactly and the ground state is found to have order along the easy axis as long as θ = π/2, whereas it becomes a highly disordered spinliquid ground state at θ = π/2 [48,49].…”
Section: Generalized 1d Compass Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frustrated spin models are known to exhibit very interesting properties and have frequently exotic ground states [26]. In systems with active orbital degrees of freedom such states may arise from intrinsic frustration of orbital interactions which, unlike the spin ones with SU(2) symmetry, are directional both in the e g orbital models [27][28][29] and in the compass model [30][31][32][33][34] -they contain terms which compete with one another. Studies of such models require more sophisticated approaches than the singlesite mean field (MF) approximation or linear spin-wave expansion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%