2018
DOI: 10.1111/jpcu.12660
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sport and Neoliberalism: An Affective‐Ideological Articulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
26
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Our point is not to suggest this film in and of itself is a site for the expressive re-enactment of normalized, highly politicized, affective investments that normalizes the affective-ideological presumptions of the prevailing neoliberal consensus. However, as part of a wider logic of Paralympic spectacle, we point to how popular Paralympic spectacle, and sport more generally (see Andrews and Silk 2018), has been co-opted by hegemonic political formations so as to normalize an ableist, and supposedly inclusive, neoliberal disability body politic. In this regard, celebrated and spectacularised ablenational parasport bodies act as seductive agents of neoliberal micro-governance which idealize particular ways of being in the world, while demonizing others (Andrews and Silk 2018).…”
Section: The Debilitated Disabledmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our point is not to suggest this film in and of itself is a site for the expressive re-enactment of normalized, highly politicized, affective investments that normalizes the affective-ideological presumptions of the prevailing neoliberal consensus. However, as part of a wider logic of Paralympic spectacle, we point to how popular Paralympic spectacle, and sport more generally (see Andrews and Silk 2018), has been co-opted by hegemonic political formations so as to normalize an ableist, and supposedly inclusive, neoliberal disability body politic. In this regard, celebrated and spectacularised ablenational parasport bodies act as seductive agents of neoliberal micro-governance which idealize particular ways of being in the world, while demonizing others (Andrews and Silk 2018).…”
Section: The Debilitated Disabledmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, as part of a wider logic of Paralympic spectacle, we point to how popular Paralympic spectacle, and sport more generally (see Andrews and Silk 2018), has been co-opted by hegemonic political formations so as to normalize an ableist, and supposedly inclusive, neoliberal disability body politic. In this regard, celebrated and spectacularised ablenational parasport bodies act as seductive agents of neoliberal micro-governance which idealize particular ways of being in the world, while demonizing others (Andrews and Silk 2018). As with Whitehead, we do not suggest that one short promotional film-this one centred on Ellie Simmonds, the UK 'poster girl' of Like Whitehead, Simmonds is an exceptional athlete, whose sport (along with track and field athletics) tends to dominate Paralympic coverage.…”
Section: The Debilitated Disabledmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Certainly, critical commentary surrounding the 2008 global financial crisis (Clarke & Newman, 2012) (see also Lowndes & Gardner, 2016;Rossi & Jeanes, 2018) would indicate that austerity is more political, than economic, in its application. As such, it has been suggested that the implementation of austerity policies (in particular in the Global West) has provided a convenient juncture through which to further extend the proliferation of neoliberal ideology that has dominated political and economic practice in recent decades (Andrews & Silk, 2018;Rossi & Jeanes, 2018). Indeed, literature suggests that rather than being a necessary response to the global economic crisis, the implementation of an austerity agenda in the UK was indicative of a neoliberal shock doctrine designed to contribute to the further destruction of public services, and further reduce the role of the state (Atkinson, 2015;Levitas, 2012).…”
Section: Austerity Neoliberalism and Community Sportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A focus on outcomes and target setting is just one example of the extent to which there has been an acceptance of governmentalisation, new public management, and neoliberal ideals within the sport sector (see, for example, Green, 2009;Grix, 2009Grix, , 2010Grix & Phillpots, 2011;Lindsey, 2009). Of course, as Andrews and Silk (2018) highlight, neoliberalism does not assert itself in a uniform or blanket manner. Indeed, neoliberalism is a concept that has proved difficult to define (Collier, 2012;Goldstein, 2012;Peck & Theodore, 2012;Wacquant, 2012), not least because of its divergences as a political or economic term (Peck & Theodore, 2012) or as a construct that is conceived as theoretically abstract or possessing an actual existence (Andrews & Silk, 2018;Collier, 2012;Goldstein, 2012).…”
Section: Austerity Neoliberalism and Community Sportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marrying philosophical and sociological perspectives, Walsh and Giulianotti (2007) explain that hypercommodification refers to the quantitative increase in the economic value of professional sports and leagues and their enclosure in all-encompassing marketised relations, as well as the intensifying commodification of secondary, ancillary, and nonplay aspects of sport. That media sport is a site for hypercommodification is widely understood because of its prominence in global consumer and media cultures, and its continuing interpenetration with neoliberal logics and “market-mediated” modes of life (Andrews & Silk, 2018; Giulianotti & Numerato, 2018; Wenner, 2014, p. 736).…”
Section: Mobile-led Hypercommodificationmentioning
confidence: 99%