“…There are three major limitations to these previous studies: (a) only the short‐term effects of CA during exercise or within 60 min of exercise cessation were examined; the duration of dynamic CA alterations postexercise remain unknown; (b) only two studies have examined the CA relationship across the cardiac cycle (Ogoh, Fadel, et al, ; Ogoh, Fisher, et al, ); as recent research has shown each phase of the cardiac cycle responds differently to a given stimulus, examining the mean may not accurately portray important subtleties between diastolic and systolic components (Smirl, Wright, Ainslie, Tzeng, & Donkelaar, ; Wright, Smirl, Bryk, & Donkelaar, ); and (c) only one of these prior studies employed a research method (oscillatory lower body negative pressure during the exercise intervention) which evoked sufficient coherence to provide reproducible interpretations of the associated phase and gain metrics (Smirl, Hoffman, Tzeng, Hansen, & Ainslie, ). Moreover, recent research has demonstrated when squat–stand maneuvers are employed to quantify CA parameters, coherence values are enhanced to near linear levels (~0.99) (Kostoglou et al, ; Smirl, Haykowsky, et al, ; Smirl et al, , , ; Smirl, Lucas, et al, ; Smirl, Tzeng, Monteleone, & Ainslie, ; Wright, Smirl, Bryk, & Donkelaar, ; Wright et al, , ). This methodological approach leads to greater reproducibility within the CA outcome measures (phase, absolute gain, and normalized gain) (Claassen et al, ; Smirl et al, ), which will enhance the interpretability and application of the findings related to the current investigation.…”