2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SPOSDS: A smart Polycystic Ovary Syndrome diagnostic system using machine learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason is the implementation of MH algorithm to choose the clusters and the clustering process with RSA identified the cyst correctly. K-means with LS-SVM (K-M-SVM) [6], Random forest (RF) [7], and PCA with gradient boosting decision tree (PCA-GBDT) [28]. The comparative results in terms of accuracy are shown in Figure 11.…”
Section: Figure 9 Roc Comparison Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason is the implementation of MH algorithm to choose the clusters and the clustering process with RSA identified the cyst correctly. K-means with LS-SVM (K-M-SVM) [6], Random forest (RF) [7], and PCA with gradient boosting decision tree (PCA-GBDT) [28]. The comparative results in terms of accuracy are shown in Figure 11.…”
Section: Figure 9 Roc Comparison Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [ 17 ], PCA with RF recorded an ACC of 89.02. In [ 6 ], RF with correlation recorded an ACC of 92.4. In [ 19 ], SVM with Pearson correlation recorded an ACC of 91.6.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result showed that RF achieved the highest accuracy. In [ 6 ], the authors used correlation feature selection methodology to select a subset of features from the database. They applied different ML models: SVM, LR, RF, DT, KNN, Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), GB, AdaBoost (AB), XGBoost (XB), and CatBoost, and obtained the optimal model based on correlation thresholds.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… Type ML Classifiers Brief Description Examples of healthcare predictions References Bagging ensemble Random Forest classifier Integrates bootstrap aggregation (bagging) and random feature selection to create a set of decision trees with controlled variation that can anticipate the corresponding output activity class [79] PCOS detection, lymph disease diagnosis, thyroid disorder analysis etc. Tiwari et al [80] , Azar et al [81] , Mishra et al [82] Boosting ensemble Gradient Boosting classifier It is an ensemble forward learning model which eliminates all weaker predictors in favor of a stronger one using an upgraded version of the decision tree, in which each successor is selected using the refined structure score, gain computation, and advanced approximations [83] Lung cancer detection, diabetes diagnosis, Leukemia prediction etc. Chandrasekar et al [84] , Bahad et al [85] , Deif et al [86] eXtreme Gradient (XG) Boosting This approach is scalable and efficient form of gradient boosting that improves on two fronts: tree construction speed and a novel distributed algorithm for tree searches [87] Heart disease detection, chronic kidney disease diagnosis, breast cancer detection etc.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%