2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11049-010-9117-x
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spotting, collecting and documenting negative polarity items

Abstract: As the nature of negative polarity items (NPIs) and their licensing contexts is still under much debate, a broad empirical basis is an important cornerstone to support further insights in this area of research. The work discussed in this paper is intended as a contribution to realizing this objective. We briefly introduce the phenomenon of NPIs and outline major theories about their licensing and also various licensing contexts before discussing our major topics: Firstly, a corpus-based retrieval method for NP… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lichte and Soehn (2007) use a corpus-based acquisition mechanism to identify NPIs, treating the relation between an NPI and its licensor as a collocational phenomenon and generating a list of candidate NPIs based on the ratio of the item's occurrences in contexts containing a potential licensor to the item's total number of occurrences in the corpus. In follow-up work, Soehn et al (2010) report on the creation of a database containing NPIs and PPIs from German and Romanian. The items in the database are described with respect to their own syntactic structure as well as their distribution relative to a set of potential licensing contexts.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lichte and Soehn (2007) use a corpus-based acquisition mechanism to identify NPIs, treating the relation between an NPI and its licensor as a collocational phenomenon and generating a list of candidate NPIs based on the ratio of the item's occurrences in contexts containing a potential licensor to the item's total number of occurrences in the corpus. In follow-up work, Soehn et al (2010) report on the creation of a database containing NPIs and PPIs from German and Romanian. The items in the database are described with respect to their own syntactic structure as well as their distribution relative to a set of potential licensing contexts.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Iyya mempe'-ki kaluku-e 1SG 1 climb-AGR 2 3 coconut-DEF 3 Negation, especially Negation Polarity Item (NPI), has been documented fairly well in some languages primarily English and Dutch (Soehn et al, 2010). But it is not the case in Buginese.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%