2009
DOI: 10.1109/tifs.2008.2009603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spread-Spectrum Watermarking Security

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a nutshell, the methodology of [1][2][3] is based on C. E. Shannon definition of security for crypto-systems. The security level is defined as the amount of uncertainty the attacker has about the secret key.…”
Section: The Problem With Previous Security Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a nutshell, the methodology of [1][2][3] is based on C. E. Shannon definition of security for crypto-systems. The security level is defined as the amount of uncertainty the attacker has about the secret key.…”
Section: The Problem With Previous Security Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem is that the previous methodology on this topic [1], although applied on Spread Spectrum [2] and Dither Modulated Distortion Compensated Quantized Index Modulation (DM-DC QIM) [3] watermarking schemes, is not so successful. As detailed in Sect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of chordal distance for watermarking security analysis was first proposed by Pérez-Freire et al [14] and is convenient because the SCD = 0 if the estimated subspaces are equal and SCD = Np if they are orthogonal.…”
Section: Estimation Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem addressed in this paper is the following: the methodology to assess the security levels of watermarking schemes, proposed in [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], doesn't completely capture T. Kalker's definition. These papers are based on the translation of C. E. Shannon's definition of security for symmetric crypto-systems [7] into watermarking terms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%