Spreminjanje urbane rabe tal v Ljubljani

Abstract

Predstavljeni so napori za izboljšanje poznavanja mestne rabe tal v Ljubljani ter problemi in perspektive spremljanja najnovejših procesov spreminjanja izbranih kategorij mestne rabe tal v mestu, mestni občini in mestni regiji.

The (non)usefulness of the Register of Existing Agricultural and Forest Land Use for monitoring the processes in urban areas

“…Next to the spatial non-homogeneity of the source DOFs in various periods, as pointed out by Krevs (2004), we find that the data capture methodology is inhomogeneous as well, and that there are missing urban land use subcategories, which causes problems in data interpretation. Miličić and Udovč (2012), Mivšek et al (2012), Lisec, Pišek and Drobne (2013), and Nastran and Žižek Kulovec (2014) also pointed out the deficiencies of the Register.…”

“…The studies until 1997, and also thereafter, focused on studying agricultural land use changes (Vrščaj 2007;Miličić and Udovč 2012;Lisec, Pišek and Drobne 2013) or landscape changes (Petek 2002;Petek and Urbanc 2004;Kladnik and Petek 2007), and through this lens they indirectly touch upon urban land use areas. Urban land use changes have been addressed by Bogataj and Drobne (2002), Krevs (2004), and Topole et al (2006). Bole (2014Bole ( , 2015 focused on identifying Slovenian traffic areas and how they are changing.…”

“…The data on the surface area of urban land for Slovenia could be acquired from the Statistical GIS Land Cover and Land Use database (Skumavec andŠabić 2005, SURS 2007), but since 2005 it is no longer updated, while already Krevs (2004) pointed out to its deficiencies.…”

Primerjalna analiza modelov pokrovnosti in rabe zemljišč v izbranih državah // Comparative analysis of land cover and land use models in selected countries

“…Sta ti sti cal Land Co ver GIS (Sta tisti cal Of fi ce of the Re pub lic of Slo ve nia) data are no lon ger kept in Slo ve nia; the only re cord co ve ring the en ti re sta te ter ri tory con ti nu ously, whe re land co ver and land use are used in terc han geably, is the Land use da ta ba se of agri cul tu ral and fo rest land kept by the mini stry res pon sib le for agri cul tu re, whi le its de fi cien cies to be used out si de its de di ca ted pur po se have been un der li ned by se ve ral aut hors (e.g., Krevs 2004; Li sec, Pišek and Drob ne 2013; Foški 2018). The mi ni mum cap tu re unit (from 25 m 2 to 1000 m 2 ) va ries ac cor ding to the type of land use.…”