2013
DOI: 10.1080/19648189.2013.781546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SPT-based liquefaction potential assessment by relevance vector machine approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the high cost and difficulty of collecting high-quality in-situ soil samples and testing granular soils, to evaluate soil liquefaction potential, geotechnical engineers normally adopt in situ testing or semi-empirical equations (liquefaction boundary curves) such as standard penetration tests (SPT) and cone penetration tests (CPT) based on machine learning methods [132]. For example, Karthikeyan et al [133] used a correlation vector machine (RVM) based on SPT to determine the liquefaction trend of soil and compared it with an artificial neural network (ANN). Xue et al [134] proposed a hybrid model based on a combination of support vector machines (SVM) and particle swarm optimization (PSO), and tested the robustness of the model based on CPT field data.…”
Section: Prediction Of Seismic Liquefactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the high cost and difficulty of collecting high-quality in-situ soil samples and testing granular soils, to evaluate soil liquefaction potential, geotechnical engineers normally adopt in situ testing or semi-empirical equations (liquefaction boundary curves) such as standard penetration tests (SPT) and cone penetration tests (CPT) based on machine learning methods [132]. For example, Karthikeyan et al [133] used a correlation vector machine (RVM) based on SPT to determine the liquefaction trend of soil and compared it with an artificial neural network (ANN). Xue et al [134] proposed a hybrid model based on a combination of support vector machines (SVM) and particle swarm optimization (PSO), and tested the robustness of the model based on CPT field data.…”
Section: Prediction Of Seismic Liquefactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from estimating compressive strength, the SVM is used for several applications in engineering, such as traffic sign detection [33], modelling soil pollution [34], predicting daily flow of river [35] predicting elastic modulus of concrete [36], modelling landslide susceptibility [37], air balancing for ventilation systems [38] and predicting shear force for base isolation device [39,40]. Its other successful applications include for example, classifying building information modelling elements [41], system reliability analysis of slopes [42], estimation of concrete expansion caused by alkali-aggregate reaction [43], damage detection in a three-story frame structure [44], prediction of lateral load capacity of piles [45], crack inspection for aircraft skin [46] and assessing liquefaction potential [47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%