2016
DOI: 10.1159/000444051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Squamocellular Carcinoma of the Skin: Clinicopathological Features Predicting the Involvement of the Surgical Margins and Review of the Literature

Abstract: Background: The new AJCC classification has highlighted some particular risk factors for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) relevant for prognosis. Incomplete excision is not infrequent in SCC. The aim of this study is to examine features that can predict an incomplete excision on the basis of the new AJCC classification and to review the literature on this topic. Materials and Methods: 81 SCC patients were included. All patients were submitted to excisional biopsy with a margin of at least 4 mm from the clinical e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In clinically well-defined low-risk cSCCs with a diameter of less than 2 cm, a margin of 4 mm has achieved cure rates of 95%e97% in prospective studies [14,20]. Nevertheless, tumour diameter is only an approximate reflection of the actual degree of tumour aggressiveness and additional histological features may increase the risk of margin involvement, even in smaller tumours [21]. Therefore, guidelines consistently propose margins between 4 mm and 6 mm for tumours lacking high-risk features [16,22e25].…”
Section: Standard Excision With Postoperative Margin Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In clinically well-defined low-risk cSCCs with a diameter of less than 2 cm, a margin of 4 mm has achieved cure rates of 95%e97% in prospective studies [14,20]. Nevertheless, tumour diameter is only an approximate reflection of the actual degree of tumour aggressiveness and additional histological features may increase the risk of margin involvement, even in smaller tumours [21]. Therefore, guidelines consistently propose margins between 4 mm and 6 mm for tumours lacking high-risk features [16,22e25].…”
Section: Standard Excision With Postoperative Margin Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present guidelines recommend 4–6 mm for the low‐risk group and 6–10 mm for the high‐risk group in consideration of the differences among systematic reviews and guidelines. However, since complete resection is impossible in some cases even by following these recommendations, 147‐149 it is permitted to set a large resection margin for more assured tumor resection. This is why we expressed our recommendations as 4–6 mm (or more) for low‐risk groups and 6–10 mm (or more) for high‐risk groups.…”
Section: Process Of Guidelines Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Проспективные исследования показали, что при хирургическом иссечении плоскоклеточных карцином диаметром <2 см низкого риска (четко определяемых клинически) отступ 4 мм обеспечивает излечение в 95-97 % случаев [96,97]. Тем не менее небольшой размер опухоли неточно отражает истинную степень ее злокачественности, и дополнительные гистологические характеристики могут повышать риск вовлечения краев резекции даже при небольших опухолях [98]. Таким образом, в руководствах предлагается использовать следующие поля: от 4 до 6 мм для опухолей без признаков высокого риска [93,[99][100][101][102].…”
Section: Fig 2 Algorithm Of Selection Of Treatment Strategy For a Patient With Squamous Cell Carcinoma Rt -Radiation Therapyunclassified