2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.04.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Squamous Cell Carcinoma Antigen in Follow-Up of Cervical Cancer Treated With Radiotherapy: Evaluation of Cost-Effectiveness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…13,33 However, some authors have debated its cost-effectiveness in follow-up. 34,35 The correlation of SCCAg levels with more advanced tumor classification also has been observed in other tumor sites, including head and neck sites; and, as in cervical cancer, a rise in SCCAg during follow-up may predate clinical recurrence. 36,37 The reported sensitivity of SCCAg in head and neck cancer is only 25.7% at diagnosis, although an abnormal level is more common with lymph node involvement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…13,33 However, some authors have debated its cost-effectiveness in follow-up. 34,35 The correlation of SCCAg levels with more advanced tumor classification also has been observed in other tumor sites, including head and neck sites; and, as in cervical cancer, a rise in SCCAg during follow-up may predate clinical recurrence. 36,37 The reported sensitivity of SCCAg in head and neck cancer is only 25.7% at diagnosis, although an abnormal level is more common with lymph node involvement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Fourteen studies (36%) were analyses of empirical data from clinical trials. Among the remaining articles, three each were (nonrandomized) prospective [14,27,33] and retrospective studies [19,28,44]; one paper [49] was classified as a retrospective study plus modeling. The number of participants recruited in non-modeling studies (n = 20) ranged between 69 [42] and 472 [37], averaging at 231 patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, its pretreatment levels was related to tumor stage, tumor size, depth of invasion, lymph-vascular space involvement, lymph node status and clinical outcome (Gadducci et al, 2004). Furthermore, it was the most accurate serologic tumor marker in cervical cancer staging and a cost-effective tool for monitoring of treatments (Esajas et al, 2001;Forni et al, 2007). The studies on relation of tumor markers and cervical cancer precursors are limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%