2009
DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.1544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SRS2 and SGS1 prevent chromosomal breaks and stabilize triplet repeats by restraining recombination

Abstract: Several molecular mechanisms have been proposed to explain trinucleotide repeat expansions. Here we show that in yeast srs2Δ cells, CTG repeats undergo both expansions and contractions, and they show increased chromosomal fragility. Deletion of RAD52 or RAD51 suppresses these phenotypes, suggesting that recombination triggers trinucleotide repeat instability in srs2Δ cells. In sgs1Δ cells, CTG repeats undergo contractions and increased fragility by a mechanism partially dependent on RAD52 and RAD51. Analysis o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

16
161
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
16
161
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increasing evidence suggests that hairpin formation occurs via DNA strand slippage during DNA metabolic processes that introduce DNA strand breaks within or near the repeat region (3,4,11). These processes include DNA replication (10,12,13), repair (2,14,15) and recombination (16,17). In addition to DNA strand breaks, which provide opportunities for strand slippage, these processes share a common feature in DNA synthesis, a reaction catalyzed by DNA polymerases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing evidence suggests that hairpin formation occurs via DNA strand slippage during DNA metabolic processes that introduce DNA strand breaks within or near the repeat region (3,4,11). These processes include DNA replication (10,12,13), repair (2,14,15) and recombination (16,17). In addition to DNA strand breaks, which provide opportunities for strand slippage, these processes share a common feature in DNA synthesis, a reaction catalyzed by DNA polymerases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CAG·CTG TNRs can expand and contract in length via replicative and nonreplicative mechanisms that have been studied extensively in Escherichia coli, yeast, cultured mammalian cells, and mice (2,3). Furthermore, studies in yeast have suggested that these repeated sequences are sites of DNA double-strand breakage and this has been compared with chromosome fragility (4,5). Recently, interplay between DNA breakage and instability of CAG·CTG TNRs has been suggested with models involving DNA ends generated via replication fork reversal (RFR) (5,6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, studies in yeast have suggested that these repeated sequences are sites of DNA double-strand breakage and this has been compared with chromosome fragility (4,5). Recently, interplay between DNA breakage and instability of CAG·CTG TNRs has been suggested with models involving DNA ends generated via replication fork reversal (RFR) (5,6). It is therefore critical to establish whether CAG·CTG TNRs are sites of DSB formation via chromosome breakage or RFR, using the model systems available.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our data suggest that in the wild- type strain with an intact Tof1/Csm3/Mrc1 complex, template switching within the (ATTCT) n repeat is a rare event (Table 1). We suggest that fork reversal caused by either an AT-richness or a slippery nature of this repeat is more common, as was also observed for other expandable repeats (32,33). In this scenario (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%