2006
DOI: 10.1080/01431160600835853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SRTM vs ASTER elevation products. Comparison for two regions in Crete, Greece

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
96
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
96
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The DEM used in this study was derived from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM), an international project to obtain a DEM for a near-global scale from 56°S to 60°N (Nikolakopoulos et al, 2006;Farr et al, 2007). The spatial resolution of the SRTM data is approximately 90 m in the Loess Plateau but varies according to location.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DEM used in this study was derived from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM), an international project to obtain a DEM for a near-global scale from 56°S to 60°N (Nikolakopoulos et al, 2006;Farr et al, 2007). The spatial resolution of the SRTM data is approximately 90 m in the Loess Plateau but varies according to location.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ASTER DEM is available in WGS84 Geoid reference datum, geographic coordinates and one arc-second elevation grid [52]. The ASTER GDEM was chosen over the SRTM GDEM (Shuttle Radar Topography Mission) due to its finer spatial resolution that closely matches that of the geo-referenced Landsat images and at comparable accuracies [53]. The ASTER GDEM has global vertical precision of ±20 m at 95% confidence interval and horizontal precision of ±35 m at 95% confidence interval [54], which was sufficient for this study.…”
Section: Digital Elevation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the orthorectified images and DSM have been produced in 2010 and are used as reference data for the present study; data gaps shown in Figure 4 concern classified areas by the Hellenic Military Services. In the absence of LiDAR-based DSM, for the validation of the produced DSM, three different approaches have been selected and used: (a) 188 random check points with elevation data from the reference dataset in of more than 50 m distance from each other (avoiding spatial autocorrelation following a rule of thumb that each point has to be at a distance of 40 times the size of a pixel [17]); (b) four line profiles across different areas, including urban canyons, open spaces, highway, and buildings of different use; and (c) 26 in situ measured points across the project area using Trimble R-10 GNSS units (Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and system corrections via the country ground reference stations of the HEPOS network (Figure 4). These have been measured at pavements corners and on roof corners of buildings but also within street canyons.…”
Section: Data Processing and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%