2002
DOI: 10.1054/jelc.2002.31818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ST-segment re-elevation unrelated to left ventricular ejection fraction or volume after anterior wall acute myocardial infarction treated with successful reperfusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The incidence of ST segment re-elevation in STEMI patients in the present study was similar to that reported in previous studies, which ranged between 23% and 29%. 10,12, 14 The absence of a significant relationship with any clinical endpoint is consistent with the findings of Matano et al 14 In that study on patients with anterior STEMI, the authors did not find any difference in LVEF or LVEDV between patients with or without ST-segment re-elevation, and the study did not have sufficient power to assess clinical outcomes. The present study in a larger (and more homogeneous) population of patients with anterior STEMI is more powerful, and takes the findings of Matano et al 14 further by showing the absence of any correlation between ST segment re-elevation and clinical outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The incidence of ST segment re-elevation in STEMI patients in the present study was similar to that reported in previous studies, which ranged between 23% and 29%. 10,12, 14 The absence of a significant relationship with any clinical endpoint is consistent with the findings of Matano et al 14 In that study on patients with anterior STEMI, the authors did not find any difference in LVEF or LVEDV between patients with or without ST-segment re-elevation, and the study did not have sufficient power to assess clinical outcomes. The present study in a larger (and more homogeneous) population of patients with anterior STEMI is more powerful, and takes the findings of Matano et al 14 further by showing the absence of any correlation between ST segment re-elevation and clinical outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…There are few data regarding the significance of ST segment reelevation after reperfusion, with most data coming from small clinical studies that were performed before the PPCI reperfusion era. [10][11][12][13][14] In these small studies, the results are discordant, suggesting either increased severity in myocardial injury, 10 increased infarct size and poorer LV functional outcomes, 11,12 subclinical pericarditis, 13 or no significant effect on LV functional outcomes. 14 Moreover, there have been no studies examining the relationship between ST segment re-elevation and clinical outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was found that ST-segment re-elevation (reSTE) following primary PCI observed in one fifth of patients with anterior STEMI with an occluded IRA on initial contrast injection was not associated with increased infarct size, left ventricular (LV) function or clinical outcomes at 1 year [9,10]. In contrast, lack of ST-segment resolution or reSTE within 24 h following PCI was associated with increased enzymatic injury and reduced LV function [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matano et al reported that ST re-elevation occurred in 29% of the patients, but that there was no difference in ejection fraction (EF) at 1 month between the patients with and without ST re-elevation. 4…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%