2019
DOI: 10.1002/asjc.2194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability analysis and a hybrid controller design of grid‐connected offshore wind farm through a VSC‐HVDC transmission link

Abstract: This paper proposes a hybrid controller which is a combination sliding mode control and PI control techniques for AC grid integrated offshore wind farm (OSWF) with voltage source converter -high voltage direct current system. The controller must be capable of controlling AC voltage, DC-link voltage, reactive power and effective power transfer. To examine the FRT capability, a symmetrical fault is applied at onshore AC grid side and compared the performances of the studied system based on the hybrid and PI cont… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other important issues to be taken into account for comparisons are the whole closed-loop system stability and the overall control complexity. Regarding the DC link voltage deviation and its dynamical behavior, the present proposal obtains, under symmetrical voltage failures, better results (maximum voltage deviation percentage and duration) than the ones shown in Dey et al [9] and Srikakulapu and Vinatha [14] and a behavior similar to the obtained in Xing et al [11] and Babaghorbani et al [18]. It is important to say that most of these articles do not present simulation results under asymmetrical voltage faults, and therefore, it is not possible to determine the robustness of these control proposals.…”
Section: Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Other important issues to be taken into account for comparisons are the whole closed-loop system stability and the overall control complexity. Regarding the DC link voltage deviation and its dynamical behavior, the present proposal obtains, under symmetrical voltage failures, better results (maximum voltage deviation percentage and duration) than the ones shown in Dey et al [9] and Srikakulapu and Vinatha [14] and a behavior similar to the obtained in Xing et al [11] and Babaghorbani et al [18]. It is important to say that most of these articles do not present simulation results under asymmetrical voltage faults, and therefore, it is not possible to determine the robustness of these control proposals.…”
Section: Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 53%
“…It should be noted that in Figure 4, dynamic expressions and blocks are related in the next way: Turbine and PMSG represent expressions (3)(4)(5)(6), DC link corresponds to (14), GCD + Line Filter indicates ( 8) and ( 9), Grid Power + Losses takes into account the resistive part of ( 8) and ( 9) and ( 11)and (12). Finally, PSC + SGSC means PSC in the converter at the PMSG side and DC link Control and GSC Control indicate Lyapunov Control at DC and at grid sides, respectively.…”
Section: General Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, this improvement makes the stability of the system very sensitive to the controller parameters when the system has a very small short‐circuit ratio. To avoid the influence of the control parameters, the authors in [20–24] designed new controller or improved the original controller to improve the stability of the system by sacrificing the quick response characteristics of the converter, but this approach is not suitable for AC system with great inertia. In addition, overly complex control algorithms are not easy to implement in engineering applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%