2010
DOI: 10.1590/s1984-70332010000400011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability and adaptability of upland rice genotypes

Abstract: -The aim of this study was to identify upland rice genotypes with high

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The high accumulated per cent value of explanation of the sum of squares on the first two axes of interaction, the adaptability and stability of rice genotypes can be graphically interpreted, considering only biplots with the first two axes of the GE interaction. This value was relatively higher than that reported for rice by Anandan et al (2009) in coastal saline environments and Balestre et al (2010) in upland environments and Kumar et al (2011) in rice who also applied the AMMI analysis. The use of phenotypic means is widespread in stability and adaptability studies on different crops, but it should not be seen as an optimal procedure to predict the genotypic values, due to the strong influence of the "noise" or interferences (block, plot, location, year, etc.…”
Section: Stability and Adaptability Analysis Using Ammi Modelcontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…The high accumulated per cent value of explanation of the sum of squares on the first two axes of interaction, the adaptability and stability of rice genotypes can be graphically interpreted, considering only biplots with the first two axes of the GE interaction. This value was relatively higher than that reported for rice by Anandan et al (2009) in coastal saline environments and Balestre et al (2010) in upland environments and Kumar et al (2011) in rice who also applied the AMMI analysis. The use of phenotypic means is widespread in stability and adaptability studies on different crops, but it should not be seen as an optimal procedure to predict the genotypic values, due to the strong influence of the "noise" or interferences (block, plot, location, year, etc.…”
Section: Stability and Adaptability Analysis Using Ammi Modelcontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…GxE can be studied by measures of adaptability and stability, which allows of a simple interpretation of a large dataset. In the context of mixed models, the harmonic mean of the relative performance of genetic values (MHPRVG) (Resende, 2007) has been shown to be one of the efficient alternatives for the simultaneous evaluation of genotypes for yield, adaptability, and stability, mainly when unbalanced data are produced (Balestre et al, 2010;Borges et al, 2010). This mixed model approach has been used efficiently in the analyses of numerous crops, such as sugarcane (Bastos et al, 2007), carrot (Silva et al, 2011), common beans (Torres et al, 2015), corn (Mendes et al, 2012;Faria et al, 2017), and rice (Colombari Filho et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That way, the hybrids plotted nearer the center of this “target” are those that have the best combination between adaptability and stability as presented by Balestre et al [22]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 85%