2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.acha.2016.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability and super-resolution of generalized spike recovery

Abstract: We consider the problem of recovering a linear combination of Dirac delta functions and derivatives from a finite number of Fourier samples corrupted by noise. This is a generalized version of the well-known spike recovery problem, which is receiving much attention recently. We analyze the numerical conditioning of this problem in two different settings depending on the order of magnitude of the quantity $N\eta$, where $N$ is the number of Fourier samples and $\eta$ is the minimal distance between the genera… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
47
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(134 reference statements)
4
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, our robustness guarantees on the low-rank matrix entries can be translated in terms of the actual signal that is recovered (for example, on the support or amplitudes of the spike in the case of recovery of spike superpositions). In fact, this has been also an active area of researches [29]- [33], [38], and we again exploit these findings for our second step of signal recovery. For example, see Moitra [32] for more details on the error bound for the case of modified matrix pencil approach for recovery of Diracs.…”
Section: F Recovery Of Continuous Domain Fri Signals After Interpolamentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accordingly, our robustness guarantees on the low-rank matrix entries can be translated in terms of the actual signal that is recovered (for example, on the support or amplitudes of the spike in the case of recovery of spike superpositions). In fact, this has been also an active area of researches [29]- [33], [38], and we again exploit these findings for our second step of signal recovery. For example, see Moitra [32] for more details on the error bound for the case of modified matrix pencil approach for recovery of Diracs.…”
Section: F Recovery Of Continuous Domain Fri Signals After Interpolamentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The common findings are that the estimation error for the location parameter {t j } p−1 j=0 and the magnitude a j,l are bounded by the condition number of the confluent Vandermonde matrix as well as the minimum separation distance ∆. Moreover, matrix pencil approaches such as Estimation of Signal Parameters via Rotational Invariance Techniques (ESPRIT) method [39] is shown to stably recovery the locations [33], [38].…”
Section: F Recovery Of Continuous Domain Fri Signals After Interpolamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The smallest known choice for A that works unconditionally without any further assumptions on Ω has cardinality #Ω log #Ω s−1 which still grows quite fast for large s. Moreover, it is known to be beneficial to oversample, i.e., to choose A larger than needed, cf. [19]. Thus, Algorithm 1 addresses the two main issues here: how to handle large columns in a still efficient way and how to ensure that the rank is controlled well.…”
Section: Prony's Problem In Several Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The oldest we are aware of is the paper [8] of Prony, where the problem is considered without noise. We note also that there is some effort [31,3,2] in the direction of overcoming this barrier in the case of univariate trigonometric setting, where the information is in the form K k=1 R r=0 a k,r (−ij) r exp(−ijt k ), |j| < N, (1.5) so that each t k appears with multiplicity R + 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%