2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability and ultimate behaviour of prestressed stayed beam-columns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This enables the main beam-column component to be pre-cambered which would counteract the effect of the self-weight by a controlled extent. As determined in the work presented in [28], two of the three zones of mechanical behaviour, which were initially discovered in [6] for prestressed stayed columns are each sub-divided into two further sub-zones of behaviour owing to the effect of the self-weight.…”
Section: Crossarm Elementmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This enables the main beam-column component to be pre-cambered which would counteract the effect of the self-weight by a controlled extent. As determined in the work presented in [28], two of the three zones of mechanical behaviour, which were initially discovered in [6] for prestressed stayed columns are each sub-divided into two further sub-zones of behaviour owing to the effect of the self-weight.…”
Section: Crossarm Elementmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Following the recent study on the zonal behaviour, the linear optimum prestressing forces, determined in [28], are used as the bases in the present study.…”
Section: Crossarm Elementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A notable contribution to the investigation of PSCs by Hafez et al (1979) identified an equation for the calculation of the amount of prestress that will result in the highest critical buckling load for a particular geometry, known as the optimal prestress. Several subsequent studies have utilised numerical modelling to investigate the behaviour of these structures under axial loading (Chan et al, 2002; Hyman et al, 2018; Li et al, 2016, 2018a, 2018b; Osofero et al, 2013; Saito and Wadee, 2008, 2009a, 2009b, 2010; Wang et al, 2019; Wong and Temple, 1982; Wu et al, 2019; Yu and Wadee, 2017b). The majority of previous studies have focused on PSCs under axial loading, when in reality these structures may be used in such a way that there is eccentricity in the loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%