1999
DOI: 10.1137/s1052623497319869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability and Well-Posedness in Linear Semi-Infinite Programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, (9) implies that min j∈J {ᾱ j +α j } ≤ max j∈J φ Z j (−u, −v − ). Letting → 0 and noting that, for each j ∈ J, φ Z j is a continuous convex function and min…”
Section: And Hencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, (9) implies that min j∈J {ᾱ j +α j } ≤ max j∈J φ Z j (−u, −v − ). Letting → 0 and noting that, for each j ∈ J, φ Z j is a continuous convex function and min…”
Section: And Hencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was inspired by the notion of consistency radius used in linear semi-infinite programming in order to guarantee the feasibility of the nominal problem under perturbations preserving the number of constraints [7,8,9]. This notion extends the concept of radius of robust feasibility introduced in [13] for robust linear programs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, this approach is new in the literature on semi-infinite and infinite programming despite many publications related to various stability properties and applications of linear infinite inequality systems, most of which concern the case of finite-dimensional spaces X of decisions variables (i.e., in the semi-infinite programming framework); see, e.g., [1,19] for comprehensive overviews on this field and also [5] confined to the parameter space of continuous perturbations P = C(T) when the index set T is a compact Hausdorff space. We refer the reader to [12] for the study of qualitative stability (formalized through certain semicontinuity properties of feasible solution and optimal solution mappings) in the framework of X = JRn, an arbitrary index set T, and arbitrary perturbations. In the same semi-infinite context, for a quantitative perspective (through ,-Lipschitzian properties), the reader is addressed to [7], and to [6] for the case of continuous perturbations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fulfilment of both the Slater condition and the boundedness (and non-emptiness) of the set of optimal solutions yield high stability for optimization problems in different frameworks (see, for instance, [18,Thm. 1] and [5,Thm. 4.2] in relation to the Lipschitz continuity of the optimal value).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T are analyzed in [5] in the linear case, and in [8] in the convex case. More details about stability of linear semi-infinite problems and their constraint systems in this general context (no continuity assumption) are gathered in [9,Chapters 6 and 10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%